Specialized has announced the S-Works Mondo, a new road bike tyre said to be the “benchmark endurance all-road tyre”.
The brand says simple endurance tyres and all-weather tyres are “dead”, with consumers now wanting longer tread life and puncture protection without compromising on speed.
The tubeless road tyre is said to cater to this demographic while outperforming other tyres in the endurance category.
We spotted the new S-Works Mondo at the 2023 Paris-Roubaix, where it was used by Peter Sagan. It was also used at the 2023 Paris-Roubaix Femmes.
Specialized says the tyre sits between its turbo and Roubaix tyres. It is available in three sizes and will cost £55/$80.
Specialized says the “concept of a simple ‘endurance tyre’ or ‘all-weather tyre’ is dead” and puncture protection and long tread life are no longer enough for an endurance road bike tyre.
The S-Works Mondo is said to be for riders who want to ride every road and achieve “race-like speed” without compromising on puncture protection or tread life.
These claims are similar to those made by other brands and reflect a wider trend away from winter tyres that compromise on speed.
For instance, the Pirelli P-Zero Race 4S is said to combine a “racing feeling” with enough durability for four-season use.
Elsewhere, the Continental GP5000 AS TR is said to have the puncture protection of the brand’s winter-ready Grand Prix 4 Season tyre, but enough speed for cyclists who want to go fast all-year round.
In order to create a fast-but-durable tyre, Specialized says it has two compounds in the S-Works Mondo.
Like the S-Works Turbo launched last year, the S-Works Mondo uses Specialized’s Gripton compound in two mixes, T2 and T5.
The T2 Gripton compound is used on the centre of the tyre for speed and durability.
Specialized uses T5 Gripton on the shoulder of the tyre for increased grip in wet and dry conditions.
While they share the same compound mixes, the two tyres differ when it comes to casings.
The Turbo has Specialized’s Blackbelt casing, which is claimed to be light and supple while providing effective puncture resistance for the brand’s ‘fastest’ tyres.
The Mondo is said to be the only tyre in Specialized’s range to use its 120 TPI Grid Race casing, which is said to have flexible, lightweight sidewall reinforcement and pinch-flat protection.
Specialized claims the S-Works Mondo has 11 per cent less rolling resistance than the “previous class-leading endurance tyre”.
It’s also said to have 12 per cent better puncture resistance than Specialized’s previous best performer. This is thanks to the Blackbelt Breaker puncture protection running along the centre of the tyres.
The brand also claims the S-Works Mondo to be 5 per cent lighter than “the nearest endurance tyre competition”.
The S-Works Mondo is available in three sizes: 700x28mm, 700x32mm and 700x35mm.
Specialized has provided recommended tyre pressures and approximate weights for each size:
Specialized has also announced a new Romin Evo Pro with Mirror saddle, said to reduce pressure by 26 per cent.
The new saddle uses the same 3D-printed pad as the S-Works Romin Evo Pro with Mirror, but it has a nylon and reclaimed carbon fibre shell, along with hollow titanium rails.
The saddle will be available in two widths – 143mm and 155mm – and will cost £290/$325.
Forbidden has launched the Druid V2, a new version of its 130mm-travel, high-pivot trail bike.
The original Forbidden Druid was launched in 2019 and while the new bike has undergone a fair few changes, Forbidden says the V2 is a case of “evolution not revolution”.
The Druid V2 has a new frame, with tweaked geometry and suspension kinematics.
The Trifecta suspension, although now using an ‘upside down’ Horst-link design, and One Ride sizing have been carried over from the previous model.
Just like its predecessor, the new Forbidden Druid frame is compatible with 29in wheels and can also be set up as a mullet bike.
It has 130mm of rear-suspension travel and is designed to run a 150mm suspension fork.
The Druid V2 is available in four sizes (S1-S4), all of which feature Forbidden’s One Ride size-specific geometry.
The Forbidden Druid’s frame has been redesigned and while it still looks a lot like the previous Druid, small tweaks to the front and rear triangle have streamlined its silhouette.
The frame hardware has been updated with durability in mind and now features locking collet axles and oversized bearings.
Full-length chainstay protection comes as standard.
The idler system has also been redesigned. The 18-tooth steel idler sprocket features a refined tooth profile to increase longevity and boost performance with the latest mountain bike drivetrains. The system uses a standard chain length (126 links or less) and is optimised for 52mm and 55mm chain lines.
All four sizes of the Druid V2 can accommodate a 750ml water bottle.
The new trail bike is compatible with a SRAM UDH dropout. This means it can be fitted with SRAM’s direct-mount Eagle Transmission.
The Druid V2’s high-pivot suspension system has been overhauled, now using a Horst-link design rather than a single pivot, as its predecessor and the longer-travel Forbidden Dreadnought do.
By swapping to this design, and relocating the idler wheel, Forbidden says it has been able to remove the lower chain guide thanks to increased chain wrap around the chainring.
The high-pivot design is said to give the Druid a 100 per cent rearward axle path, enabling the rear wheel to absorb impacts from the trail without sacrificing forward momentum.
As the rear axle moves backwards in compressions, the rear centre of the bike also grows, which should make the Druid feel more stable under heavy impacts.
Forbidden says it uses the Druid’s Rate Control Linkage to tailor the Trifecta suspension further. It claims to have achieved supple small-bump performance with a supportive mid-stroke and a progressive bottom-out.
The aim of all this is to produce a “trail bike that punches way above bikes with more [travel]”.
One Ride encapsulates Forbidden’s aim to deliver a consistent ride feel across all its sizes.
By having size-specific front and rear centres, the rider’s weight distribution is identical across sizes, meaning riders of all heights will benefit from the same handling and performance.
The Druid V2’s chainstays grow from 423 to 466mm through the size range. The effective seat tube angle remains consistent too, ensuring taller riders also benefit from a comfortable pedalling position.
Compared to the original Druid, the head angle has been slackened by half a degree (29in configuration). The rear centre has also grown considerably on all sizes, from 438mm to 452mm in size S3, and the reach has been stretched by 15mm across the range.
Size | S1 (MX/29) | S2 (MX/29) | S3 (MX/29) | S4 (MX/29) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reach (mm) | 435/440 | 455/460 | 475/480 | 495/500 |
Stack (mm) | 614/610 | 627/624 | 641/637 | 654/651 |
Top tube length (mm) | 582/581 | 605/604 | 628/627 | 651/650 |
Seat tube length (mm) | 400 | 420 | 440 | 470 |
Seat tube angle (degrees) | 76.6/77 | 76.6/77 | 76.6/77 | 76.6/77 |
Head tube length (mm) | 90 | 105 | 120 | 135 |
Head tube angle (degrees) | 64.5/65 | 64.5/65 | 64.5/65 | 64.5/65 |
Front centre (mm) | 754 | 781 | 807 | 833 |
Rear centre (mm) | 423 | 437 | 452 | 466 |
Wheelbase (mm) | 1,177 | 1,218 | 1,259 | 1,299 |
BB drop | -29/-35 | 29/-35 | 29/-35 | 29/-35 |
BB height | 332/337 | 32/337 | 32/337 | 32/337 |
The Forbidden Druid V2 is available in three builds and a frame-only option. Forbidden hasn’t provided full spec lists for the Druid V2 models at the time of publishing.
Senior technical editor Alex Evans rode Forbidden’s all-new Druid V2 X0 29in wheel trail bike for an afternoon on his local trails in Scotland’s Tweed Valley. These are his initial impressions:
I inflated the rear shock to 205psi, giving 35 per cent sag as per Forbidden’s recommendations. I set the external rebound damping to fully open, low-speed compression damping to +4 clicks from fully open and high-speed compression damping to +4 clicks from fully open.
I inflated the fork to 89psi, set the low-speed compression to +3 clicks from fully open, and fully opened the rebound damping and high-speed compression adjusters.
The Druid’s repositioned, larger idler wheel and lack of lower chain guide means little to no drag or vibrations can be felt through the cranks when putting down the power.
Backpedal and there’s as much (or as little) friction as a standard drivetrain design.
Its suspension kinematics are tuned with the idler wheel’s potion. There’s almost no pedal bob, wether you’re pedalling seated or standing, which meant I didn’t need to engage the shock’s climb lever.
Small-bump suspension sensitivity wasn’t affected by the pedalling platform, helping improve comfort and traction.
Thanks to a steep 77-degree seat tube angle, your hips are positioned directly above the bottom bracket, combining with the suspension’s efficiency.
The steep seat tube angle and relatively short (627mm) top tube create a winch and plummet enduro bike feel; the seated climbing position is upright, with most of your weight concentrated through your sit bones.
Downhill, the 480mm reach and 637mm stack, combined with a low-slung 337mm bottom bracket height, give the bike a commanding and confidence-inspiring position.
This creates a neutral and balanced platform; it remains stable and on-line in tough, technical sections, or as speeds increase without needing significant rider inputs.
The chainstay and wheelbase grow as the bike sinks into its suspension’s supportive mid-stroke in turns.
This extension increases stability, but it also takes a bit of getting used to. The centre of the bike effectively moves further forward as it compresses, which causes you to lean back instinctively.
Once accustomed, you can drive the front wheel harder and more confidently. If you want to break traction or flick it about, that’s also possible, but it does require more effort compared to shorter bikes.
The frame has a muted and damped feel, no doubt helped by the suspension’s action and impressive Crankbrothers Synthesis wheels.
Along with its smooth, plush-feeling rear end, it feels like it has more travel than its headline figure suggests; there’s plenty of grip and control on tap.
Small to medium bumps are eaten up proficiently and it enters its mid-stroke support smoothly, cushioning impacts.
However, set with 35 per cent sag, I tended to use most of its travel frequently, relying on the rear shock’s hydraulic bottom-out.
Decreasing sag to 29 per cent boosted its mid-stroke performance and reduced how much travel it uses, aiding control.
The Maxxis Assegai front and DHR II rear tyres have suitable tread patterns, but the EXO casing MaxxTerra front is under-gunned for the Druid’s potential. It will limit performance on wetter or gnarlier tracks.
The diminutive 180mm front and rear rotors lacked power and bite; the increased power of 200mm discs would only benefit.
The Druid V2’s high pivot gives this 130mm-travel bike plenty of attitude.
Sitting comfortably in the trail bikes category, a lot of people are going to like the stability and confidence the Druid V2 exudes on the descents. Seemingly, the downsides you frequently experience with a high pivot on climbs – such as drivetrain inefficiencies – are non-existent.
With a few spec changes, such as improving the tyres and brake rotors, the Druid V2 should be able to go toe-to-toe with much burlier bikes.
]]>Chris King has a new all-road wheelset, with the ARD44 adding to the marque’s recently introduced range of gravel and mountain bike wheels made from a recyclable thermoplastic material.
Chris King claims the carbon footprint of the ARD44’s rims is 30 per cent lower than a standard epoxy-based carbon rim.
Whereas the prepreg strips used for standard carbon rims need to be kept refrigerated, which uses energy, the FusionFiber material used for the ARD44 rims is stable at room temperature.
It was developed by US-based CSS Composites and Chris King says it took around 18 months of R&D to perfect the rim design.
There’s significant harmful waste generated by epoxy-based rim manufacture, according to Chris King, while FusionFiber rim production is fully automated and results in zero waste. The rim also takes around a third as much heating time to cure as a conventional carbon rim.
Instead of using epoxy as the matrix to hold the carbon fibres, FusionFiber has a nylon matrix.
Among the advantages of its rim material, Chris King says nylon is less brittle than epoxy, so it’s less likely to crack under stress.
Its flexibility means the rim is stronger and more comfortable than epoxy. Chris King’s tests show its ARD44 rims can withstand up to 275 per cent of the UCI standard for impact resistance and a spoke pull force of over 950lb.
The wheelset has a lifetime warranty, but FusionFiber is also recyclable and Chris King says if a rider were to break a rim, it would be shipped back to its factory in Utah, chipped and made into something else.
The new Chris King ARD44 wheelset is designed for both road and gravel use. While its aerodynamics are tuned around the 28mm to 32mm-wide tyres that are typical on modern road bikes, the wheels can handle gravel bike tyres up to 47mm wide.
The rim has a hookless bead with a 25mm internal rim width, 30.5mm external width and a depth of 44mm. It is designed to be run tubeless. Claimed weight for the rim is 435g, while the complete wheelset weighs a claimed 1,525g.
According to Greg Hudson, wheel product manager at Chris King: “These ARD44 wheels represent everything we’ve come to understand about what makes riders faster.
“We already had a hub we knew outperformed the competition, but getting this rim completed the picture. That the rim could also be made in a more sustainable way is the cherry on top.”
Chris King is famed for its hubs and the ARD44 wheels run on the R45D design.
This uses Chris King’s RingDrive freehub system, with its characteristic bulge on the freehub side of the hub body and 45 points of engagement. The standard hubs have steel bearings, but there’s a ceramic bearing upgrade option, which adds $120 to the ARD44 wheelset’s $2,850 cost.
Chris King makes the R45D hubs in a wide range of colours. The new logo is low-profile though, with a large black-on-black Chris King wordmark and the ARD44 model name in small lettering.
The Strive:ON is Canyon’s first enduro-specific electric bike and features an aggressive geometry, carbon frame and 160mm of rear-suspension travel.
The new bike sits between the Spectral:ON and Torque:ON in Canyon’s electric mountain bike line-up, with the prices starting at £5,499/€5,799 for the CFR Underdog edition and £6,699/€6,999 for the CFR, both of which feature a Bosch Performance Line CX electric bike motor.
A flagship CFR LTD model will be available later in the year, sporting a custom Fabien Barel colour scheme and Bosch’s 2 Line CX Race motor. Prices for the limited-edition model will start at £8,999/€9,499.
All models are available with either 625Wh or 750Wh batteries, with the larger-capacity battery adding an extra £200/€200 to the bike’s price.
The Strive:ON is available now to order in Europe, with bikes arriving on US shores later in the summer. Canyon has yet to confirm an exact date or US pricing.
The Strive:ON features a full carbon fibre frame that Canyon say uses the same carbon layup as the top-tier Strive CFR and weighs in at 3,268g for a size medium, including all assembly parts.
A Horst-link suspension linkage is still used, similar to that on the non-assisted Strive, but the shock is now horizontally mounted to leave room for the motor, top tube storage and a bottle cage.
Canyon hasn’t included the Shapeshifter system found on the Strive. The Shapeshifter system uses a Fox-built air piston in the shock mount, which alters the damper’s position, giving the bike two geometry and travel settings for pedal efficiency and downhill ability.
The bike has been designed around Bosch’s Performance Line motors and also uses the brand’s PowerTube batteries.
Canyon offers the bike with a 625Wh or 750Wh battery pack on all frame sizes, with the brand wanting to give riders the option of a lighter bike or a longer range.
The motor and battery terminal are protected by a moto-inspired skidplate, allowing the bike to ground out on technical terrain without damaging the frame or motor, according to Canyon.
Magnets feature on the inside of the guard to hold the retaining bolts when changing the battery, so you don’t lose them.
While all the models in the Strive:ON line-up feature air shocks, Canyon says the new bike is compatible with a coil shock.
Coil shocks are becoming more common on electric mountain bikes, because the weight penalty is less of an issue when you have a motor to assist on the climbs.
All the bikes in the Strive:ON line-up feature a 170mm fork, with Canyon saying the bike is not dual-crown compatible, because the wide down tube that houses the battery would cause the fork to interfere with the steering angle.
The underside of the top tube has bolts for on-bike storage systems such as a tube or multi-tool holder, while the forks will feature Canyon’s new screw-on fenders that mount directly to RockShock Zeb and Fox 38 forks.
Canyon says it has updated the Strive:ON’s geometry compared to the non-assisted Strive, adapting the bike to meet the demands of e-enduro racing, which combines downhill trails with technical climbing stages.
The Strive:ON has a claimed head angle of 63.5 degrees, which is up-to-date with current geometry trends for enduro bikes.
A reach measurement of 475mm for a medium-sized bike makes it longer than other bikes in its class, such as the Orbea Wild, which has a 450mm reach for a similar-sized frame.
S | M | L | XL | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seat tube length (mm) | 395 | 420 | 435 | 460 |
Top tube length (mm) | 584 | 610 | 637 | 665 |
Head tube length (mm) | 110 | 120 | 130 | 145 |
Head tube angle (degrees) | 63.5 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 63.5 |
Effective seat tube angle (degrees) | 78 | 78 | 78 | 78 |
Actual seat tube angle (degrees) | 72.3 | 72.6 | 73 | 73.3 |
Chainstay length (mm) | 445 | 445 | 445 | 445 |
Wheelbase (mm) | 1,245 | 1,274 | 1,304 | 1,336 |
Stack (mm) | 628 | 637 | 646 | 660 |
Reach (mm) | 450 | 475 | 500 | 525 |
Spacers (mm) | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Stem (mm) | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
Handlebar Width (mm) | 780 | 780 | 800 | 800 |
Crank arm length (mm) | 165 | 165 | 165 | 165 |
Dropper travel (mm) | 150 | 170 | 200 | 200 |
Canyon says it has given the frame a steep effective seat tube angle of 78 degrees to assist the bike going uphill. This is around two degrees steeper than the Specialized Turbo Levo.
Chainstay measurements are short at 445mm, with the bike using a mixed wheel size mullet setup. Canyon says this gives the Strive:ON high-speed stability and tight-trail agility.
Canyon offers the new Strive:ON with Bosch’s Performance Line CX or Performance Line CX Race motors depending on the spec level.
Both motors deliver 600 watts of peak power with 85Nm of torque and have rapid motor response, meaning the power is delivered early in the pedal stroke.
The Performance Line CX Race on the Strive:ON CFR LTD increases pedal assist from 340 per cent to 400 per cent, meaning less input is required for more power output.
It also adds a race mode, which is said to deliver power faster and stronger.
The Race motor features an extended overrun mode that gives the bike an extra boost once the pedals have stopped spinning, helping to power up technical climbs by keeping momentum.
]]>
CeramicSpeed has expanded its UFO range of drivetrain efficiency products with separate wax chain lubes for wet weather and indoor riding.
The range, launched after CeramicSpeed acquired Friction Facts in 2017, now features smaller chain lube bottle sizes, reduced from 180ml to 100ml.
The UFO Drip Wet and UFO Drip Indoor are priced at $24 for a 100ml bottle.
CeramicSpeed has renamed its original product, UFO Drip Chain Coating, as UFO Drip All Conditions. It will also be sold in a 100ml bottle for $24.
Alongside the new chain lubes, CeramicSpeed has also released a UFO ‘eco-friendly’ bike wash.
CeramicSpeed says the wet-weather wax lube was developed with WorldTour teams, such as Intermarché-Circus-Wanty, during the 2022 season.
The team’s head mechanic, Mikey Van Kruiningen, says the UFO Drip stays on for 300km and “we can rely on it in bad conditions”.
Professional gravel racer Brennan Wertz also says UFO Drip Wet lasted the duration of last year’s mucky edition of Unbound Gravel, although this claim does come from UFO’s press material.
In a lab test, where water was applied constantly to a chain, CeramicSpeed says Drip Wet was better than its competitors in terms of watts lost over five hours.
“The protocol for the wet condition test is quite straightforward,” reads CeramicSpeed’s press material. “Add a chain – coated with UFO Drip Wet Conditions – to an automated drivetrain that can uphold 250 watts with no fluctuation at a speed of 56 km/h. Water will constantly be supplied to the chain during the entire test period.
“After 20 minutes, we remove the chain and check the ‘loss of watts’. Then we add it again to our water test. Every hour after that, we repeat the watt loss test. This process continues for five straight hours.”
CeramicSpeed says external testing is also being carried out by Adam Kerin of Zero Friction Cycling. The brand says it will publish this data when it is available.
CeramicSpeed says its Drip Indoor delivers the benefits of using a waxed chain on your smart trainer without shedding excess wax onto your floor.
The brand claims to have adjusted the formula of its chain lube to maximise efficiency while minimising build-up of wax on the chain.
The UFO Bike Wash is said to be an eco-friendly, perfume- and scent-free foaming bike soap.
CeramicSpeed says it’s safe to use on all parts of your bike, so you won’t need to worry about contaminating your disc brakes when you clean your bike.
A 500ml bottle of UFO Bike Wash costs $22.
]]>The best electric bike for you will depend on the type of riding you want to do, so in this guide we’ll cover the whole range of different electric bike types and recommend some of the best we’ve tested.
Electric bikes – or ebikes as they’re commonly known – are bicycles with an electric motor and battery that provides assistance as you pedal.
There are many benefits to riding an electric bike. Electric bikes make riding up hills easier and will enable most riders to travel at a higher speed over longer distances without arriving at their destination covered in sweat.
Despite common misconceptions, you can still ride an electric bike for fitness. Electric bike laws limit the power of an ebike’s motor, so you still need to pedal – there’s no twist-and-go throttle here.
There is an electric bike for every type of riding. Electric folding bikes and electric hybrid bikes are great choices for cycling to work, the best electric mountain bikes will help you get to the top of the next trail so you can enjoy more descending and the best electric road bikes and electric gravel bikes will enable you to take on longer adventures.
Making sense of how an electric bike works and how to choose the right one for you is a daunting task. Luckily for you, BikeRadar’s team of expert testers have put in hundreds of hours riding more than 175 electric bikes across all categories.
Our testing is 100 per cent editorially independent, so you can always trust our recommendations.
In this in-depth buyer’s guide to choosing the best electric bike for any rider, we’ll talk you through the things you need to consider for each category of ebike. We also highlight the best bikes we have reviewed, as selected by BikeRadar’s expert team of tech editors, for each type of ebike, with links to our detailed buyer’s guide for each category.
We also have a general buyer’s guide to electric bike tech at the bottom of this article that answers common questions. For even more information, take a look at our ebike FAQs.
There’s a lot to cover here, so use the links below to skip to the section you need, or read on for every detail.
Like a non-assisted hybrid bike, electric hybrid bikes feature an upright riding position, flat bars and stable handling. They’re often the least expensive entry point into ebikes.
With lots of mounting points for accessories such as pannier bags and mudguards, electric hybrids are great if you’re planning to commute to work by bike, ride around town or want to go for leisurely rides on bike trails or through parks.
Electric hybrid bikes can be quite heavy because they tend to use less sophisticated motor systems and the bikes are built for robustness. This is worth bearing in mind if you need to carry them up stairs.
Below is a selection of four of the very best electric hybrid bikes as tested by our senior road technical editor, Warren Rossiter. For more recommendations, check out our full round-up of the best electric hybrid bikes.
Specialized makes two electric hybrid bike ranges. Whereas the standard Turbo Vado is a heavy-duty ebike, the Vado SL uses a less powerful motor with 35Nm of torque. This reduces the weight to under 15kg, but the flip side is that you have less assistance than with the Turbo Vado, which could be a problem on hills.
The other advantage of the lower output is clean looks, with the concealed battery giving a sporty appearance. Specialized fits lights to all models and includes mudguards and a luggage rack on pricier models.
The Canyon Pathlite:ON 5 is a powerful electric hybrid bike that handles and rides commendably. Our testing found the Canyon’s 100km claimed range to be true, but there’s no denying the bike is heavy at 23.5kg.
Where the Pathlite:ON 5 truly stands out is off the tarmac, where it rivals electric mountain bikes with confidence-inspiring chunky tyres and a shock-absorbing suspension fork.
The Tern Quick Haul P9 looks like a cargo bike at first glance, but its compact design means it isn’t much longer than a typical electric hybrid.
With the option to fit a huge array of useful add-on accessories both front and back, our tester described the Quick Haul P9 as a “genuinely viable car replacement”.
If you want to cycle to work or are just pressed for space to store your ride, a compact electric folding bike could be the answer.
Folding ebikes often have the battery hidden in their frames, or they may come with a removable battery to make carrying them on and off public transport a bit easier.
A removable battery also means you can take it somewhere where it’s easier to charge (at your desk, for example, if you use the bike to ride to work).
But the extra weight of the motor and battery means carrying a folding ebike on and off public transport, and up and down stairs, will be harder. The available range can be quite limited in some models too.
For more product recommendations, check out our round-up of the best folding electric bikes.
A front-hub motor adds electric power to the classic Brompton folding bike, giving you a range of around 40km. The battery sits in a separate pack, which can be removed from the bike for carrying.
Since we tested the Brompton Electric, the standard bike has been redesignated the C Line Explore. It’s been joined by the P Line, which uses lighter frame materials and components to chop almost 2kg off the C Line’s 17.4kg claimed weight.
VanMoof’s S5 and A5 electric urban bikes are now available in a sleek dark grey finish.
The bikes include a powerful acceleration button, a re-engineered ‘ultra-silent’ motor and a long-range battery. The brand’s 5-series bikes also include integrated anti-theft tech, so you can park up with peace of mind.
You can also check your speed and battery charge on the handlebar’s LED interface.
Not sure if electric is for you? Book a test ride and get a feel.
While pricey, the GoCycle G4 is a folder, commuter and electric bike in one. The ride and handling are far more assured than most folding bikes on- and off-road, thanks to the meaty tyres and larger wheels.
The bike folds in half at its centre, making it easier to roll than to carry and the removable battery in the front of the frame is accessed via the fold. At over 17kg, it’s quite heavy though.
The MiRider One GB3 is an upgrade from the original model we tested a few years ago. Unfortunately, that’s resulted in a significant price hike, but the ebike is still a compact, nippy city commuter.
The belt drive is cleaner and lower-maintenance than a chain, there’s good adjustability, and built-in rear suspension and wide tyres add comfort.
The GB3 design has three speeds, adding flexibility over the singlespeed predecessor, and you can change gear while stationary. We achieved a range of up to 50km.
An electric mountain bike will get you to the top quicker, particularly on technical, steeper climbs, and with more energy to enjoy the descents. Plus, getting up the ups more easily will give you extra range to explore further.
Recent improvements in eMTB performance mean handling is approaching that of the best mountain bikes without a motor, providing heaps of flat-out riding fun.
But, nevertheless, the extra weight can make handling more tricky on particularly technical sections, so it’s a good idea to ease off a bit until you’ve got the feel of the bike
This is a small selection of the best electric mountain bikes we have tested, as selected by our expert team of mountain bike tech editors, Alex Evans, Robin Weaver and Tom Marvin.
The Vitus E-Sommet adds a powerful Shimano EP8 motor and large-capacity battery to Vitus’ enduro platform. It rolls on a 29in front and 27.5in rear wheel mullet build and is impressively specced for its price, with a 170mm RockShox ZEB Ultimate fork, a Super Deluxe Select+ RT shock and Shimano’s XT groupset.
The E-Sommet descends and climbs impressively, with both comfort and great grip, making it fun, engaging and highly capable.
The Marin Rift Zone E2 is a classy, comfortable full-suspension electric mountain bike with 140mm travel. It can take you beyond its trail riding mandate, handling more technical descents well.
The Rift Zone ebike is well specced for its price, although the Shimano EP801 motor’s 85Nm torque is a little less than competitors. We’d have preferred a smaller chainring than the 38t fitted for easier climbing.
The Whyte E-160 RSX is a well-equipped enduro bike, with its battery mounted below the Bosch motor to lower its centre of gravity.
Whyte says the full down tube this allows improves torsional rigidity as well. Lower-spec E-160s are available in both 29in and ‘mullet’ form, so you can pick your preferred wheel configuration, although this top-spec model is 29in only.
Despite its 26kg-plus weight, we found the low centre of gravity made for impressive downhill performance, although we’d have liked to see a slightly steeper seat tube for better climbing.
If you enjoy road cycling, but want a bit of help to keep your speed up or to get you up hills, an electric road bike could be the right choice for you.
Most e-road bikes use lightweight motor systems that provide less power than the motors used on electric hybrid or mountain bikes. This means they’re typically a bit lighter too, with the very lightest models tipping the scales at around 11kg.
However, with many road riders achieving speeds on the flat of 15mph or above, you may feel you’re carrying dead weight around, with the motor cutting out at that top-assisted speed, although assistance can continue to 20mph, or even in some cases 28mph in much of the USA.
Below are three of the very best electric road bikes senior road technical editor Warren Rossiter has tested to date.
The BMC Roadmachine AMP One doesn’t look much different from its non-assisted sibling; it’s only the slightly expanded down tube, hiding a 350Wh battery, that shows there’s extra assistance. The Mahle X20 motor is so compact it hides between the largest cassette sprocket and the disc rotor.
The ride feels like the non-assisted Roadmachine as well, despite the 12kg weight. Range is impressive, heading up to 160km, depending on the conditions. We’d swap out the tyres for winter use though.
The Scott Addict eRide Premium has similar geometry to the Scott Addict RC Disc and the same carbon frame. The result is a possible sub-11kg build powered by the consistent ebikemotion rear-hub motor.
Neatly concealed in the down tube, the battery managed 100km and 2,000m elevation in testing. The 2022 version of the bike has been renamed as the Scott Addict eRide Ultimate.
The Cannondale SuperSix EVO Neo 2 is yet another electric road bike modelled on an acclaimed unassisted bike, the Cannondale SuperSix EVO. The Mahle ebikemotion motor-equipped Neo 2 blends a racer’s looks and crispness with fantastic range.
Electric gravel bikes mix the racy ride position and range of an electric road bike with a tamed-down version of the off-road capability of an eMTB – the same winning combination that makes the best gravel bikes so popular.
Electric gravel bikes may feature more powerful motors than e-road bikes, with some even including the same motors seen on electric mountain bikes. They also tend to feature lots of useful mounts for accessories and tons of tyre clearance for chunky gravel tyres, making them a very versatile option.
This is a selection of the very best electric gravel bikes, once again ridden, reviewed and rated by our senior technical editor, Warren Rossiter.
The GT Grade Amp features an aluminium frameset and is powered by the Mahle ebikemotion rear-hub motor system. The geometry is the same as the non-powered GT Grade Carbon, which also scored well on test.
The frame is a little too stiff on rough terrain, but the 42mm WTB Resolute gravel tyres help soak up any big bumps.
Offering 30mm of suspension front and rear, the Topstone Neo is a tremendously comfortable and capable gravel bike that is loads of fun to ride on singletrack trails.
The top-tier SRAM eTap AXS mullet gearing gives ample range for steep climbs and the Bosch motor has loads of power on tap.
If you’re after a slightly less punchy electric gravel bike, the Mahle ebikemotion-powered Topstone Neo SL could be worth a look.
The Giant Revolt E+ is powered by a Shimano EP8 motor, the same unit as used in many of the best electric mountain bikes. It gives an impressive 85Nm of torque to help you ride steep climbs, despite the bike’s chunky 18kg weight.
The 500Wh battery powers not only the motor but the Shimano GRX shifting, which enables you to control the power level from the gear shift levers. It also gives plenty of range and we got up to 120km on a charge.
Electric bike motors are located in one of three places: in the middle of the bike, in the rear hub or in the front hub.
Many systems will have mid-mounted motors that sit at the bottom bracket and power the ebike through the chain. It’s a good position for the motor because it puts the extra mass low down and centrally in the frame where it won’t affect the bike’s stability and handling.
The rear-wheel hub is also a popular place to put the motor. Again, it’s low down and since a lot of the rider’s weight is on the back wheel, handling and road grip are not too adversely affected by the extra weight and power.
Finally, the motor may be in the front hub. It’s a slightly trickier position because the motor unit can affect steering and generally there’s not as much weight on the front wheel, so grip may be impacted. It’s often used for folding ebikes and sometimes for hybrids.
As well as ready-built ebikes, you can buy kits to convert a non-assisted bike to an ebike. There are kits that use a motor in each of these positions. We’ve got a round-up of the most popular ebike conversion kits.
An electric bike will be powered by a rechargeable lithium-ion battery. Like the batteries in other electric vehicles, they’re used for their low weight and performance, along with rapid recharging – typically charging to full capacity in a few hours.
In general, the more expensive the ebike, the larger the battery capacity, so the mileage you can get between charges increases.
There’s a range of battery shapes, sizes and positions. Bolted to the top of the down tube is a popular option and some hybrids have the battery positioned below a rear luggage rack. Some ebikes will have their batteries hidden within the down tube or sometimes the seat tube, making for a more elegant (and invariably more expensive) solution.
Bottle-cage batteries are another way to disguise the battery and are often used for a back-up battery to increase range.
The batteries themselves can normally be charged from a standard wall plug, either in situ on the bike via a port or with the battery itself removed from the bike. It’s very common to see removable battery packs that are secured with a key.
How far you can ride before your battery gives up is unlikely to be an issue for most ebike riders – it’s more a question of how often you can ride before you need to recharge it.
Range is very dependent on your riding style, and where and how you ride, as well as being dependent on the battery capacity. Some ebikes will have multiple batteries that might eke out 100 miles or more from a charge, whereas others, particularly folding ebikes designed for easier carrying and folding and for shorter city rides, may have a range of 20 miles or less.
There will be multiple assistance levels that you can tailor to your needs and select between as you ride. Select an eco or low assist mode and you will need to put in more effort, but your battery will last longer.
On the other hand, a higher assist setting is useful to get you up hills and to accelerate more easily in stop-start conditions, but will drain your battery significantly faster.
You can swap between modes as you ride and can usually switch the motor off entirely to conserve battery. With most systems there won’t be any additional drag when the motor is not in use, although you still have the extra weight of the motor and battery.
To control the motor’s output, an ebike will have a range of sensors. First, there’ll be a speed sensor, so that assistance cuts out at the legal maximum speed.
To match the assistance level to your pedalling input and make sure that an ebike won’t run away with you, there’ll be cadence and torque sensors too.
More sophisticated systems may add more sensors. The Giant Trance E + 1 electric mountain bike, for example, uses five sensors in all to control its output in Smart Assist mode.
There’ll be some sort of display of battery and assistance level, along with buttons to select the assistance mode. The display is often a bar-mounted LED unit that might also give you speed, distance and range info.
More minimalist displays are often used on racier road ebikes though, with the front of the top tube being a popular position. Some may work via a cycling computer.
Many ebikes will also come with a companion smartphone app. Functionality varies, but more sophisticated apps will give you battery status info, enable you to tailor assistance levels and may include some GPS-based route planning and navigation, as well as the option to share your ride records.
How much additional assistance your motor gives you as you ride. Most ebikes will have multiple levels to switch between as you ride, depending on the terrain (and your energy levels). Some will be able to automatically switch support level up and down, depending on where you’re riding or to conserve your battery levels. More power means less range.
Short for Electrically Assisted Pedal Cycle, this is the official legal term often used by the UK government to describe ebikes.
Output for an ebike motor is typically measured in watts. That’s a measure of the maximum power it can produce.
Ebike battery capacity is measured in watt hours – or, in other words, how many watts a battery can put out and for how long. So if a 250-watt motor was fed by a 250Wh battery and run at full power, the battery would drain in an hour. In practice, your motor doesn’t run at full power much of the time, so your battery will last considerably longer than this.
For eMTBs, in particular, torque is also an important figure. It measures how much turning force a motor will put in, something that helps add to your own effort especially when climbing hills.
Another synonym for an electric bike.
If you’re going to have to push your ebike, a walk mode will use the motor to move the bike along with you. Since ebikes tend to be heavy, it’s useful if you need to push your machine any distance.
Neutron Components’ Emergency Bleed Kit is a portable brake bleeding tool designed to restore your disc brakes to tip-top condition on the road or trailside.
Until now, the New Zealand brand has been best known for its sub-60g Ultralight First Aid Kit and its Oh Sh!t Kit, a multi-tool that stashes inside your handlebar.
The Emergency Bleed Kit is effectively a bleed bucket. The CNC’d aluminium funnel features two threaded caps on either end – a threaded lid and an M5 threaded connector at its base, matching most Shimano and SRAM bleed port screws.
Neutron says you should fill the Emergency Bleed Kit with 10ml of brake fluid before you set off for your ride, ready for when you need to use the kit.
The kit is 75mm long and I weighed it in at 19g (or 29g when full) on my digital scales.
Neutron claims the kit is leak-proof, a reassuring claim because the last thing you want is brake fluid spilling in your pack. The brand claims it has bench-tested the seals to an altitude of 12,000m.
A 2.5mm hex key and a T10 Torx key are included to suit both Shimano and SRAM bleed ports.
There’s also a guide on how to use the kit, but the process is much like how you would burp-bleed Shimano disc brakes.
Neutron Components says it’s best to only use the tool with one type of brake fluid. Mineral and DOT fluid are not cross-compatible with one another. If you switch between brake fluids, make sure you scrupulously clean the bleed kit first with isopropyl alcohol.
The tool isn’t compatible with Shimano road or gravel, SRAM DB8 or Magura brakes, because they use different thread sizes (although you can use an adaptor for the former).
The kit retails for NZ$49, which converts to roughly £24.50/$31.50/€28/AU$45.
I tested the Neutron Emergency Bleed Kit on a couple of bikes with spongy-feeling levers.
I was pleasantly surprised by how well the kit performed – it works exactly as described.
Crucially, the kit seems to be fully waterproof. I dunked a filled kit in a glass of water and couldn’t detect any air bubbles escaping. That said, you’ll probably want to change the seals from time to time because seals can swell over time, particularly if you’re storing DOT fluid.
I burp-bled a Shimano XTR M9100 brake on a Canyon Lux World Cup, managing to eke a couple of rogue air bubbles out of the system and the brake felt noticeably firmer.
I thought the supplied hex keys would be throwaway items, but I was pleasantly surprised by their quality.
The keys were hard enough to avoid rounding the Shimano lever bleed ports screws, which are often as strong as soft cheese.
Things are a little different when it comes to SRAM brakes. You’d very rarely (if ever) burp-bleed a SRAM brake because, unlike Shimano’s bleeding process, you push and pull between the two syringes to remove air bubbles and pressurise the system.
As a result, using the Emergency Bleed Kit to burp bleed a SRAM Code RSC made a minimal difference to the lever feel.
You’ll want to carry a rag that can get rid of any fluid that leaks, particularly DOT because it’s corrosive on paint.
Is the Emergency Bleed Kit worth taking on your next bikepacking trip? Possibly not, if your bike is in tip-top condition. But it could prove useful if you’re venturing into territory with no bike shops nearby.
While the kit is intended to be taken with you on rides, it’s a significant step-up in quality from Shimano’s bleed bucket and could make a nice upgrade for any home or workshop mechanic.
]]>The Giro d’Italia heads off from Fossacesia Marina, midway down Italy’s eastern Adriatic coast, on Saturday 6 May 2023, arriving in Rome three weeks later, on Sunday 28 May.
It’s only just over 160km between the race’s start and end points, but in the interim riders will have covered 3,489.2km, an average of 166.2km a day. They’ll have taken in the best vistas Italy has to offer, as well as a short excursion over the Great St Bernard pass into Switzerland. They’ll also have climbed over 51km vertically.
The big clash is expected to be between Primož Roglič of Jumbo-Visma and Remco Evenepoel of Soudal–QuickStep. The two last went head to head at the 2022 Vuelta a España; Roglič abandoned after a crash, Evenepoel finished as overall winner.
Unlike the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia has limited free-to-air coverage in many countries, so it’s quite difficult to keep up with the action unless you have a paid subscription.
Eurosport will show live coverage of the Giro d’Italia 2023 and, as usual, there’s an on-demand option. Coverage times are to be confirmed.
Eurosport is being merged with Discovery+, with a subscription costing £6.99 per month or £59.99 per year. It’s available on a range of platforms including tablets, mobile, TV with Chromecast or AirPlay, Android TV or Apple TV.
You can also watch the Giro d’Italia on GCN+, with coverage times to be confirmed, although expect to be able to view each stage in its entirety and ad-free. GCN+ usually includes both daily highlights and analysis in its Giro coverage, as well as the live action.
A monthly subscription to GCN+ costs £6.99, the same as Discovery+; an annual subscription to GCN+ costs £39.99.
Much of the early-season racing was covered in the US by Flobikes, but the Giro d’Italia will be shown on GCN+.
That means, as for UK viewers, there will be full, ad-free coverage of each stage, with post-stage analysis and highlights available both live and on demand.
An annual pass to GCN+ costs $49.99, while you can also sign up month by month for $8.99.
There’s also coverage on BeINsports.
SBS will be covering the Giro d’Italia live and on demand on SBS Viceland, with live coverage of Stage 1 starting at 9:35am AEST on Saturday 6 May. The full schedule is here.
GCN+ also has rights to the Giro d’Italia in Australia and New Zealand, so you’ll have the same coverage options as in the UK and US.
There’s live terrestrial coverage in many European countries, with Italian chain Rai showing the racing live on Rai 2 and Rai Sport (times TBA), and on Rai Play for on-demand access. If you have a VPN, you may be able to sign in to watch, complete with Italian commentary to get the full Giro experience.
There’s a full list of broadcasters by country on the Giro d’Italia’s site here.
YouTube is a good option if you want shorter highlights and you don’t have on-demand access to any of the above sources. You can also watch short highlight videos on the Giro d’Italia site, although the Giro’s own highlights are often patchy and appear at variable intervals after the end of the stages.
Both are also good sources for highlights of previous editions to get you geared up for the racing.
]]>The best road cycling helmets will combine head protection, aerodynamics and ventilation.
They can be expensive, but the best budget bike helmets hold their own for less than £100/$100.
Cheaper models might lack crash protection technology (see our buyer’s guide further down this post). However, all helmets must pass stringent testing standards to be approved for sale. Even without extra safety features your helmet will help protect you in a crash.
For drag-reduction, head to our best aero road helmets list. If you’re looking for off-road head protection, we have a guide to the best mountain bike helmets.
We’ve organised this buyer’s guide into the best road cycling helmets at different price levels. You can click the links below to jump to the section you need.
Then scroll down to the bottom for our buyer’s guide to choosing the best road cycling helmet.
The Cannondale Junction has many of the attributes of premium road bike helmets without the price tag.
Its quality comfort, cooling, protection and low weight make it an outstanding bargain.
Its small, removable peak hints at gravel riding potential and our tester was happy to wear it when venturing off road.
Looking more expensive than its price tag, the Van Rysel RoadR 500 helmet from Decathlon is comfortable with a race-oriented outline and 14 large vents that do a good job of cooling. The dial adjuster feels a bit cruder than higher-priced helmets, though.
The RoadR comes in two sizes and three colour options. It’s not quite as compact as the Van Rysel Aerofit 900, although that helmet will cost you £10 more.
The Giant Relay MIPS is a budget helmet with a 5-star rating in Virginia Tech‘s independent helmet testing. Quality features include in-mould construction and anti-odour padding.
The 17 vents ensure good airflow and the helmet doesn’t feel heavy when riding.
The retention adjuster works well and the MIPS Cinch system is well integrated.
The Specialized Align II budget helmet provides MIPS protection, good padding, ventilation and fit.
On the flip side, the 374g weight for the size M/L helmet is a little on the high side and could be felt during our test.
The Bell Avenue MIPS helmet offers crash protection technology at a comparatively affordable price.
Its retention system is easy to adjust and very effective. The polycarbonate shell is well ventilated and reflective.
Its 310g weight is heavier than some other helmets at this price.
The Specialized Propero 3 is packed with safety features. It also shares the looks and high airflow of Specialized’s high-end Prevail helmet.
The Propero 3 is pretty lightweight at 305g for a size M. The straps worked well even under high-intensity, sweaty efforts.
Corus builds Bluetooth connectivity into the Safesound road helmet, enabling you to listen to music without blocking out sounds from around you. Incident detection alert your emergency contacts via the app.
It’s a comfortable helmet with good ventilation and reasonably low weight.
The Endura Xtract II is light at 270g for a large road bike helmet and looks good.
Large front and rear vents and deep channelling to encourage airflow between them. Quality features such as a shell that fully wraps the EPS core and thick, hard-wearing straps make for a helmet that belies its budget price.
Although targeted at gravel riders, the Limar Air Stratos is a 240g road bike helmet that works well on the road too.
There’s plenty of padding and adjustability, and the helmet is well finished, belying its low price. But the dial adjuster is a little small. There’s no MIPS in the helmet.
The MET Allroad is designed for gravel riders, but if you like your road or commuting lid to have a bit of mountain bike style then don’t let the marketing get in your way.
The adjustable retention system also integrates a rear light and is compatible with ponytails.
The Allroad is very comfortable and breathes well, just like a high-quality road helmet, even with the extra protection it offers for off-road duties.
The Bontrager Starvos WaveCel road bike helmet contains collapsible cellular construction technology, which is claimed to be more effective at impact absorption than EPS.
It’s very airy, adding extra comfort to rides in hot weather. Despite weighing 375g in size large, we didn’t notice the heft in testing.
The Starvos WaveCel is comfortable and adjustable. An extra-large option fit heads from 60cm to 66cm.
The Endura Pro SL helmet uses Koroyd impact-protection technology, which is said to help protect your brain from direct and angled impacts. The protection comes in the form of honeycomb-like tubes inside the helmet, and plush padding ensures these don’t lead to an uncomfortable fit.
In fact, the Pro SL is very comfortable to wear. It has a cradle with vertical adjustment and a ratchet that enables you to dial in optimum fit.
One thing to bear in mind is we found the helmet was warm in hot weather.
The new Centric Plus helmet carries on where the original left off with a design that’s been wind-tunnel tested and has large vents for great airflow. There’s easy adjustment and Scott has now added MIPS’ anti-rotation system, integrated into the padding as seen in Specialized’s high-end helmets.
There’s better air circulation over the crown of the head, with additional vents relative to the previous-generation Centric. It’s well finished and weighs an impressively light 272g for a size L.
The size large StormChaser helmet, the third in Abus’s road line-up after the GameChanger and AirBreaker, is impressively light at 238g.
There’s deep channelling for good ventilation and soft straps, making for plenty of comfort when riding, although the fixed strap anchor points limit adjustability.
Large reflectives at the rear increase visibility and the internal skeleton is designed to help maintain the integrity of the helmet in an accident. There’s not a MIPS option.
At 317g for a size large, the Bell Stratus is not the lightest helmet on the market, but that’s not noticeable when wearing it. Ventilation is fantastic too.
It’s great to see a MIPS liner at this price point and it doesn’t hurt that it looks very smart as well. Plus, if lime green isn’t your favourite colour, there are eight alternative choices.
HJC Velceo is an aerodynamic and fairly light road bike helmet.
The Valeco uses multiple densities of EPS foam, positioned for extra protection in high-stress areas and lower weight in less critical zones.
The solid rear end means the helmet can become a bit sweaty around the nape of the neck.
The Genesis is Lazer’s pro-level helmet and at 210g it is one of the lightest available too.
There are 22 vents that provide ample ventilation and five levels of vertical adjustment to help find the right fit.
Overall, the build quality is great, but a lack of hardshell coverage at the back means you’ll have to be careful not to dent the exposed foam.
The MET Rivale MIPS hits a sweet spot between aero efficiency and head-cooling properties.
The Rivale is also comfortable to wear with soft internal pads and soft-touch straps.
Overall, the helmet has a high-quality feel with an exemplary finish and a hard exterior shell that protects the EPS foam.
The presence of MIPS provides a good level of protection.
The Oakley ARO3 MIPS comes with MIPS for safety and front vents that can hold sunglasses. The rest of the ventilation works well, even at lower speeds in high temperatures.
The Boa 360-degree fit system is easy to adjust and ensures the ARO3 MIPS sits securely.
But the largest 56-60cm size may prove too small for some, so try before buying if your head measures towards the top of the range.
The POC Omne Air SPIN helmet has a great fit, innovative safety features and effective ventilation.
The rotary dial retention system acts on a band encircling the head for great security and adjusts between four vertical positions. It’s a stylish-looking lid too.
Rudy Project Nytron aero helmet meets the WG11 rotational impact protection standard, although it doesn’t incorporate MIPS.
It’s light at 307g for a size L too, and well finished, although the venting only works well and catches the airflow if you ride in a head-down position.
The S-Works Evade 3 is Specialized’s updated aero helmet and an excellent one at that.
Better ventilation than the outgoing Specialized S-Works Evade, including two front vents to hold sunglasses, augment the Evade 3’s versatility.
What’s more, the S-Works Evade 3 scores highly for safety and looks reasonably conventional despite its aerodynamic credentials.
There’s no getting over the cost though – £275 is a lot of money to fork out for a replacement in the event of a crash.
The Giro Eclipse Spherical uses Giro’s own MIPS Spherical, which integrates a sliding plane between two layers in the shell, making for a neater implementation than the more common liner.
It’s an aero helmet that Giro claims is the slipperiest out there, with a low-profile shape, while 17 vents help keep you cooler than many such lids. It’s not too heavy either at 277g for a medium and the padding incorporates silver to help keep it smelling nicer.
Like the Giro Eclipse Spherical helmet, the Helios Spherical uses Giro’s neat MIPS implementation. Geared to gravel riding, the Helios Spherical takes less account of aerodynamics than Giro’s more road-oriented lids.
It’s a compact helmet with a fairly round interior shape, minimal padding and 28 vents to keep you cool. We found it really comfortable, with the padding well placed and good ventilation. The 303g weight of the size L helmet is reasonable too.
MET’s top-of-the-range Trenta 3K Carbon has MIPS Air built in to protect you, while minimising weight. In a size L (58 to 61cm), it’s 265g.
It has a striking wave-shaped rear profile, made up of the two exhaust vents, and a wind-tunnel backed Kammtail for an aero benefit. The ventilation is a key element of the helmet.
The hardshell doesn’t wrap fully around the underside, which won’t affect how it rides but may impact its longevity.
The Giro Aries Spherical scored full marks in Virginia Tech Lab’s safety testing and at the time of its release was the highest-scoring helmet.
Its excellent protection features, including MIPS, don’t add much weight though. Our large test sample weighed a mere 310g.
The Giro Aries Spherical will keep your head cool on the most sultry summer rides while remaining comfortable. But you’ll have to pay a lot for it.
The Kask Protone is a stylish road bike helmet. A soft leather chin strap and a reflective strip on the rear are welcome additions to comfort and safety.
Weighing just 230g, the Protone is one of the lightest helmets on this list.
Helmet cage height can be adjusted readily and gives a wide grip, with tension controlled using a well-designed grippy dial. It’s ponytail-friendly for long-haired cyclists too.
There’s no specific technology for rotational impact protection. Kask says it has been tested (using Kask’s WG11 internal protocol) to ensure it would provide protection in such a crash, but this may still be a drawback to some.
Lazer’s top-of-the-range Vento Kineticore aero road helmet is well ventilated and good looking.
According to Lazer, it is also 2.3 per cent more aerodynamic than its predecessor, with a 12 per cent improvement in cooling efficiency. While it’s hard to verify the aero bonus, we could easily believe the cooling benefit – feeling a stream of air coming through the helmet top when riding.
The Vento gets five stars from Virginia Tech, achieved by the use of ‘Kineticore’. This is an EPS block-based protection against both direct and rotational impact – providing a shear layer with specific crumple zones.
It weighs 290g, but doesn’t feel heavy or bulky to wear. A comfortable fit and easy adjustment mean its weight doesn’t impact on experience. Rubber docking points for glasses are also featured and work well.
With the Manta, MET looked to turn the aero helmet on its head, keeping the weight low and ventilation high.
At 272.6g for a size large, it is indeed a light helmet considering its watt-saving design. It’s relatively aerated too, but it still won’t keep your head as cool as many non-aero lids.
When it comes to safety, the helmet is fitted with MIPS.
The fit of the helmet is excellent and there’s a host of great details, such as a magnetic Fidlock clasp.
The only downside to this helmet is the high price tag.
The third iteration of the Specialized S-Works Prevail helmet retains the original’s great ventilation and low weight (258g for a size M). Rather than the usual EPS foam bridges between the ribs, there’s an aramid cage, which leads to huge vents for great airflow on hot and hilly rides.
MIPS doesn’t impede airflow because Specialized uses the Air Node version that’s integrated into the internal padding, which stays impressively dry, even over the brow, on hot days. Fit is great and highly adjustable. You can fit Specialized’s ANGi crash alert system, although it’s an extra.
We’ve also recently tested the slightly cheaper S-Works Prevail II Vent helmet, which has much of the Prevail 3’s lightweight airy design in common.
First and foremost, in the event of a crash, a helmet has to stay on your head to be effective. Just like shoes, helmets from different brands are made to fit slightly differently, so it’s important to try before you buy.
Most helmets use a dial-based retention system (e.g. Giro’s Roc Loc 5 or Kask’s Octo Fit) to adjust the fit, but the vertical adjustment range (i.e. how high or low the rear adjustment supports sit on your head) will vary between helmets, so this is something to look out for.
Adjustable and comfortable straps are also incredibly important – you need to be able to wear them with a fairly snug fit against your chin for maximum effectiveness.
Most cycle helmets are made primarily from expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam. This skeleton is then covered, to varying degrees, in a hard polycarbonate shell (and sometimes a dash of carbon fibre) to add strength and protect the EPS foam from accidental bumps and scratches.
This basic design has been in place for decades now, but other manufacturing techniques and materials are beginning to filter through, such as 3D-printed Polyamide 11 or other proprietary polymer materials.
Naturally, manufacturers claim these designs offer benefits over traditional cycle helmets, but whether those benefits are realised in use remains to be seen.
While we won’t comment on the overall efficacy of helmets in general, it’s worth noting that all helmets sold in the EU must conform to the EN 1078 European Standard (and therefore have a CE mark). In the US, they must be CPSC-certified.
Every helmet on this list does just that, if not more, and should at least offer your head some protection against bumps and scratches if you fall off your bike while out riding.
Recently, we’ve seen a substantial increase in additional safety technologies such as rotational liners (e.g. MIPS) and Bontrager’s proprietary WaveCel material. These innovations are claimed to offer increased protection from head and brain injuries by reducing rotational forces or simply by using materials that are better able to absorb certain shocks.
There is some independent safety testing of cycle helmets, but these things are obviously harder to test outside of the lab, where there are so many variables at play. On balance, these extra safety features are almost certainly worth looking for and have now trickled down to quite inexpensive lids.
For fast road riding, especially in hot weather, ventilation is key. A well-designed system of vents and channels in the internal structure of a helmet can help to draw air over your head and dissipate heat.
As might be obvious, putting holes in a helmet to increase ventilation is likely to lead to reduced weight and, potentially, robustness. So, to make up for that, airy helmets often need more reinforcement or are constructed with pricier materials, to ensure they still meet safety and durability standards.
The aero brush touches everything these days, increasing costs and making all your current kit feel outdated, but with helmets it probably does make sense. The potential watt savings to be made with aero helmets shouldn’t be overlooked if you’re concerned with riding fast.
There are compromises of course: increasing aerodynamic efficiency usually means closing off ventilation holes or putting up with funky-shaped lids that, frankly, have looks that sometimes border on the ridiculous. But then again, if your main concern is simply to ride faster, perhaps looks aren’t that important.
Only a few brands actively promote their helmets’ ability to hold your sunglasses in the front vents, but this feature can be a real bonus.
Helmet brands that also make sunglasses tend to do better in this regard, but make sure to take your sunglasses with you when you’re shopping for a new helmet so you can check the hold.
Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, but it is worth considering what kind of riding the helmets you like the look of are designed for.
Let’s say you like classic-looking helmets with lots of vent holes; if you live somewhere cold, maybe you’d be better off with a more aero-focused helmet with less ventilation and holes for water to seep through.
Likewise, the opposite could be true if you live somewhere hot; there’s no use having a helmet that’s incredibly fast in the wind tunnel if you don’t want to wear it because it makes your head boil.
]]>Vittoria has officially revealed its new flagship Corsa Pro TLR tyre, which arrives with the claim of a 12 per cent reduction in rolling resistance compared to the outgoing model.
The new Corsa Pro range replaces the existing Corsa line-up and contains three tyres, the aforementioned Corsa Pro, the Corsa Pro Control for racing on rough roads and, arriving in 2024, the time-trial-specific Corsa Pro Speed.
Built around a 320 TPI (Threads Per Inch) cotton casing, the Vittoria Corsa Pro range uses a new construction method dubbed ‘light vulcanisation’ to marry the characteristics of traditional cotton tyres with those of vulcanised ones.
Vittoria claims this brings big improvements to a number of key performance characteristics, including puncture resistance and weight, as well as rolling resistance, compared to the previous-generation Corsa G2.0 TLR range.
Having originally been spotted on Team Jumbo-Visma’s team bikes in late 2022, the new Corsa Pro tyres have since been used to win multiple WorldTour races this season, including Monument Classics such as Milan-San Remo and Paris-Roubaix.
BikeRadar’s senior technical writer, Simon von Bromley, headed to Vittoria Park in Bergamo, Italy, for the press launch, so click through to read his first ride review of the new Vittoria Corsa Pro TLR.
Vittoria’s Corsa tyre range has traditionally used a high-thread count, unvulcanised cotton casing paired with a tread that was glued on top.
In contrast, most modern bicycle tyres are made from nylon casings with the tread attached seamlessly via a process called vulcanisation.
Vittoria has long maintained that unvulcanised cotton tyres can offer superior performance to vulcanised tyres.
This, it claims, is because the high-thread count cotton casings can be lighter and more flexible than nylon ones. Vulcanisation also causes the rubber used in the tyre tread to harden.
While nylon casings and harder rubber can offer improved durability (this was Vittoria’s key pitch behind its vulcanised Corsa N.EXT TLR tyre, which launched last year), Vittoria argues they are detrimental to ride feel and rolling speed.
The new Corsa Pro range, however, is manufactured using what Vittoria is calling ‘electrical vulcanisation’ or ‘electrical curing’.
Where traditional vulcanisation methods use hot gases, Vittoria says its method uses electricity to heat and cure the tyre with greater precision. The process is also said to be more environmentally friendly than standard vulcanisation techniques.
The result is a tyre which appears to combine a traditional-style cotton casing with a tread that is attached seamlessly like on a vulcanised tyre.
According to Vittoria, this enables the Corsa Pro range to offer the best of both worlds – the supple ride feel and speed of cotton tyres, alongside the improved durability of vulcanised tyres.
Vittoria hasn’t quoted a mileage range, but puncture resistance is claimed to have improved by 18 per cent on the Corsa Pro TLR, 7 per cent on the Corsa Pro tubular and 19 per cent on the Corsa Pro Control TLR, versus the previous G2.0 versions of each.
Nevertheless, the Corsa Pro TLR, Corsa Pro tubular and Corsa Pro Control are also claimed to be 4, 4 and 2 per cent lighter, respectively (again, compared to the previous versions).
Our size 700 x 28c Corsa Pro TLR samples weigh 274g per tyre. That’s 21g lighter than the claimed weight of 295g and 41g lighter than the Corsa G2.0 TLR we tested in 2021.
Our Corsa Pro Control TLR samples weigh 314g per tyre in the same size, 6g less than the claimed weight of 320g.
Vittoria has championed the use of graphene in its tyre compounds for almost a decade, claiming it offers improvements to rolling resistance and puncture resistance.
For the new Corsa Pro range, Vittoria has adopted the compound formula that debuted on the Corsa N.EXT.
This sees silica added to the mix, which is claimed to improve grip and the tyre’s wear life.
The combination of the two substances is also claimed to offer significant gains in terms of rolling resistance versus what Vittoria calls “normal compounds”.
Compared to the previous-generation tyres, Vittoria says rolling resistance has improved by 12 per cent on the Corsa Pro TLR, 14 per cent on the Corsa Pro tubular, and two per cent on the Corsa Pro Control TLR.
The improvement is smaller on the Corsa Pro Control TLR because it has increased tread thickness for improved puncture resistance and wear life.
A table comparing the Corsa Pro TLR’s performance in both lab and real-world tests compared to benchmark competitors (Vittoria hinted strongly the yellow competitor is the Continental GP5000 S TR, while the blue competitor is the Schwalbe Pro One TLE) claims it matches or exceeds both in a number of key areas.
It notes the Corsa Pro TLR isn’t quite as competitive in terms of weight, though our sample tyres (274g each, as previously noted) are actually lighter than the Continental and only 10g heavier than the Schwalbe tyre.
In terms of tread patterns, the Corsa Pro TLR and Corsa Pro tubular use the same parallel grooves as on the previous-generation tyres.
The Corsa Pro Control TLR, though, sees added fishbone textures on the shoulders of the tread. Vittoria claims this feature improves the tyre’s “handling feeling” when cornering, although it notes this isn’t a quantifiable metric.
Of the three tyres in the range, the Corsa Pro TLR is Vittoria’s flagship road bike tyre, designed for racing and fast road riding.
The Corsa Control TLR is Vittoria’s top tyre for racing on rough roads. Vittoria says it gives up a little speed and weight in return for greater puncture protection and grip – not dissimilar to the Continental GP5000 AS TR.
The time-trial-specific Corsa Pro Speed (a successor to the Corsa Speed G2.0) is still in development and is slated to launch in 2024.
All are tubeless-ready and compatible with hookless rims in sizes 700 x 28c or larger, to a maximum inflation pressure of 72.5psi / 5 bar.
RRPs for the tubeless tyres is £89.99/$99.99/€94.95, while the Corsa Pro tubular costs £119.99/$135.99/€119.
A tubular version of the Corsa Pro will also be available, but there are no clincher versions in the range (though the tubeless versions can be used with inner tubes if desired).
In an unusual turn of events, the new Corsa Pro tyre range is only available with tan sidewalls, or “para sidewalls”, as Vittoria calls them.
The Tour de Lunsar is Sierra Leone’s biggest bike race, set up by bike shop owner Abdul Karim Kamara as a way to give Sierra Leonians the opportunity to race.
The first edition of the race took place in 2013, when 10 riders took to the start line on bikes donated by the US and shipped to West Africa by the Village Bike Project, an NGO that aims to empower communities through strengthening bike culture.
Ten years later, the Tour de Lunsar has grown in size and reputation, attracting cyclists who want to make it professionally.
The 2023 edition of the event started on the 26 April, Sierra Leone’s independence day, with men’s, women’s and junior races, all of which take place on non-closed roads, competing with traffic and causing lengthy tailbacks.
The men’s race is split across four stages. The first starts in Freetown, the country’s capital, and each stage ends in Lunsar.
The women’s race and junior races are single stages culminating in laps of a circuit in Lunsar.
There were 141 competitors in total. 51 riders took part in the men’s race, 19 in the women’s and 70 in the junior competition.
Unlike European races, there are no team buses, just cars that have bikes strapped to them in piles. Nigeria’s Team Access Bank by Pitstop had a masseuse table for its riders – something that is de rigueur at professional races such as the Tour de France, but exceptional at the Tour de Lunsar.
Temperatures rose to 38 degrees and riders sought out shade before setting off.
Cycling may still be a fringe activity in Sierra Leone, but the Tour de Lunsar is helping the sport grow in stature. The 2022 edition was attended by the government minister, Apha Kanu, and it is now in partnership with Science in Sport and has sponsors including Le Col.
The racing in Sierra Leone is a lot more makeshift than in Rwanda, which is set to host the 2025 UCI road world championships and has been a trailblazer for cycling in Africa.
However, the Tour de Lunsar demonstrates an appetite and passion for cycling and bike racing in a way that’s unlike any other competition.
In the words of our photographer Matt Grayson, it is “a story of sporting persistence against adversity” and arguably one of the seedlings of a cycling revolution described in Marlon Moncrieffe’s book Desire Discrimination Determination.
The majority of riders still take part on donated or second-hand bikes, but with an increasing number of riders in Sierre Leone competing and racing at a higher level, the number of high-end bikes at the race is growing, too.
Here we take a look at 10 of the bikes raced at the Tour de Lunsar.
This Cannondale CAAD8 was ridden at the Tour de Lunsar by Kerfala Kamara, riding for the Freetown-based team C2C in the elite men’s race.
The aluminium road bike shows a heavy dent in the top tube and is decked out with Shimano 105 brakes, Bontrager cranks and American Classic wheels.
There is an IPSXP bike computer on the handlebar with a cable running down to a sensor on the front fork.
While many of the bikes at the Tour de Lunsar come from the United States, Mohamed M Kargbo was racing on a bike from the British brand Boardman for the Lunsar Cycling Team B.
A shallow aluminium rear wheel is matched with a mid-section, carbon Ritchey front wheel.
The bike has a Shimano Tiagra drivetrain with a 10-speed cassette.
Some of the riders on the Lunsar Cycling Team A were racing on Team USA Felt bikes, like this one used by Osman Trumpet Kalokoh.
The bikes were purchased in a crowdfunding campaign, having been used previously by riders in different age groups in the USA national cycling programme.
Some had been crashed and damaged, but US mechanic Jamie Bissell repaired the carbon frames, which were then bought by Lunsar Cycling Team.
95 per cent of bikes in Sierra Leone are said to reach the country by shipping containers.
They are donated to organisations such as Working Bikes in Chicago, Village Bicycle Project in Salt Lake City, Mikes Bikes in California and Re-Cycle in the UK.
C2C’s rider Ibrahim Kamara was racing on a more modern Planet X Superlight Pro Carbon.
The compact carbon frame is decked out with a Shimano 105 drivetrain and brakes components, DT Swiss RC 46 Spline hybrid carbon and aluminium wheels, and a slammed stem.
Kamara raced with a Hammerhead Karoo 2 bike computer.
Sahr Josiah rides for the Kono Cycling men’s team and competed on this Cannondale R1000 Aero.
Disrupting the narrative of aero bikes being a relatively new phenomenon, the ‘made in America’ R1000 Aero was released in 2000.
The bike has an integrated seat mast with a cutaway saddle clamped to the top.
The wheels comprise of aluminium Mavic rims laced to Shimano Ultegra hubs and are shod in Michelin Dynamic Sport road tyres with red sidewalls.
The bike has an Ultegra drivetrain with Shimano 150 rim brakes.
Mohamed Bangura of Kono Cycling Team came second in the junior race.
He rode this Specialized Alllez donated by an American who lived in Kono, in eastern Sierra Leone, roughly 240km from Lunsar.
The disc brake-equipped bike has a mechanical Shimano Ultegra drivetrain with a semi-compact chainset and Shimano 105 shifters.
The Roval C38 carbon wheels are wrapped in S-Works Turbo tyres.
Racing for the Lunsar Cycling Junior Team, this is Ali G Koroma’s first bike, given to him by Abdul Karim Kamara via the Village Bicycle Project, an organisation that provides bicycles and maintenance training to people in rural villages in West Africa.
The steel frame shows where cables have worn away at the paintwork and rust dots the cassette, rear hub and quick-release axle.
The bike’s drop handlebar eschews bar tape and has stem-mounted shifters.
Preye John Dede of Nigeria’s Team Access Bank by Pitstop was the overall race winner in the men’s elite category.
Dede raced on a Giant TCR Advanced in a dream spec comprising of SRAM, Hunt, Continental, CeramicSpeed and Rotor components.
The bike has deep-section Hunt 50 Carbon Wide Aero wheels with Continental GP5000 tyres, a SRAM Red eTap AXS groupset with CeramicSpeed pulley wheels and Rotor power meter cranks.
Dede won the first three stages of the race to claim overall Tour de Lunsar victory, with teammate Bright Emmanuel taking the fourth stage.
Emmanuel launched an attack before heading into the final crit circuit of the fourth stage.
Jack Duncan and Nate Mesmer of Team Mike’s Bikes from the USA tried to close the gap, but Emmanuel held his lead to the finish line.
One of the highest-spec bikes at the race was this Cervélo S5 owned and raced by Mojirayo Olaniyan from Team Access Bank by Pitstop.
Olaniyan finished eighth in the women’s race, 17 minutes behind winner Roxanne Hargreaves.
Like Dede’s Giant TCR, Olaniyan’s aero road bike has a SRAM Red eTap AXS groupset with CeramicSpeed pulley wheels.
The Reserve 65mm-deep wheels are wrapped in 25mm Continental Gator Hardshell tyres.
The Tour de Lunsar saw a number of riders compete on older Cannondale bikes, but Nate Mesmer raced on this Cannondale CAAD13.
Mesmer donated his bike to the Lunsar Cycling Team after the race.
The Mike’s Bikes Foundation facilitates bike donations from the USA to Sierra Leone. It works with partner bike shops in Sierra Leone to pay for the shipping of the bikes.
Bikes must have a market value of at least $50 before being sent.
The partners in Sierra Leone sell the bikes or use them for parts. Profits are used to pay wages, help run races and fund cycling projects.
As well as shooting these bikes, Matt Grayson was on the ground in Sierre Leone to photograph the racing action in the Tour de Lunsar.
Modern braking for bikes is dominated by three systems: the disc brake, the caliper rim brake and the V-brake.
The hydraulic disc brake is rapidly taking over, with its widespread adoption on road bikes following the much earlier swap to discs on mountain bikes.
That increasingly leaves caliper rim brakes and V-brakes as the domain of cheaper bikes, although some top-tier road teams outside of the WorldTour still race on rim brakes.
Here’s everything you need to know about bike brakes, including the different types of brakes available, how they work, and a short history of every brake that has ever existed.
There are three main types of brakes on modern bikes: disc brakes, rim brakes and V-brakes. We’ll cover each of them in turn.
The majority of new bikes, whether that’s road bikes, mountain bikes or hybrid bikes, now use disc brakes that operate by pushing pads housed in a caliper against a brake rotor attached to the wheels’ hubs. We’ll go into different types of disc brake below.
Over the past five years, road disc brakes have rapidly taken over from rim brakes, which push brake pads against the wheel’s rim. There are good reasons for that, mainly related to more efficient and consistent stopping, whatever the weather.
On that note, and as we mentioned at the top, mountain bike disc brakes have been commonplace at all levels for years, providing powerful stopping power uninfluenced by trail conditions.
Disc brakes and caliper rim brakes take the lion’s share of braking duties across most bikes, but you’ll also find V-brakes on some cheaper urban or commuting bikes.
These also work on the rim and are attached to frame bosses on either side of the wheel. V-brakes (also known as direct-pull cantilever brakes) are operated via a cable that runs from one side of the brake and across the top, pulling the two halves together.
There are other brake designs out there, but they’re a rarity on mainstream bikes. Still, we’ll give you a full rundown at the end of this article.
Almost all bike brakes are operated using a lever mounted on the handlebars.
On bikes with a flat handlebar, including mountain bikes, there’s usually a brake lever separate from the bike’s gear shift levers.
Drop-bar road bikes and gravel bikes usually combine the brake lever and gear shifter into one unit (with separate units for the front and rear brakes), although older bikes had separate shifters on the down tube, and you can sometimes see shifters at the ends of the bars.
Single-chainring groupsets (known as 1x, or ‘one-by’) will have one brake lever with a gear shifter built-in, while the other lever will only work as a brake.
Singlespeed bikes have levers that just operate the brakes, as there are no gears to operate.
When you operate the brake lever, either it pulls a cable or pushes hydraulic fluid through a hose. In either case, there’s a physical line to the brake caliper from the lever.
We’ll explain the differences between how rim and disc brakes work in detail below, but in both cases, applying the brakes pushes pads against a braking surface to generate friction and heat to slow or stop the bike.
In a disc brake, the brake pads are housed in a caliper bolted to the frame.
The front brake caliper is attached to the left fork blade and the rear brake usually to the left chainstay, but occasionally to the left seatstay or between the two. They house brake pads that act on a rotor attached to the wheel’s hub, pressing against this to slow the bike.
The brake caliper is either mounted on posts protruding from the bike’s frame (usually found on mountain bikes). This standard is referred to as post-mount.
Flat-mount is an evolution of this and sees the caliper bolted to a designated flat surface on the frame (the default system now used on road bikes, gravel bikes and some cross-country mountain bikes).
Disc brake pads are typically made from an organic, sintered or semi-metallic compound, each with its own advantages and disadvantages depending on the type of riding you’re doing.
The disc brake rotor is usually made of steel and sized between 140mm and 203mm in diameter, with larger rotors used where stronger braking is needed, such as on downhill mountain bikes.
The rotor may be connected to the wheel hub with either six bolts or using Shimano’s Centerlock system, where a lockring screws onto threads in the hub.
Centerlock is seen on the majority of road bike wheels. The lockring is usually threaded on its inside face and tightened with a cassette lockring tool.
You can also buy externally flanged lockrings, which tighten with a bottom bracket cup tool. Some wheels need an externally flanged lockring because the axle is too wide for a tool to fit on an internal flange.
One potential issue with disc brakes is that the rotor can get quite hot when in use. This can lower braking efficiency and also cause the rotor to warp.
Brake manufacturers try to get around this in a few ways; first, rotors and pads may include cooling fins to help lower their operating temperature. It’s the method used by Shimano in its road and mountain bike rotors.
Second, rather than being made in one piece, the rotor may be ‘floating’. This is where the braking surface is riveted to a carrier spider that bolts to the wheel hub. When it heats up, a floating rotor should expand more evenly than a solid rotor and so is less likely to distort. The float also helps even out pressure between the pads acting on the two sides of the rotor.
Finally, rotors may be made of a sandwich of steel with an aluminium core, which again helps with heat dissipation and also reduces weight.
In a hydraulic disc brake, a piston in the brake lever pushes hydraulic fluid through the brake hose when the brake is applied. The fluid pushes the brake pads together and against the brake rotor. When the brake is released, a spring pushes the pads away from the rotor and back into their housings.
Hydraulic disc brakes will work efficiently with convoluted hose runs from the brake levers to the brakes, so they are a good option for triathlon and time trial bikes with internal hose routing.
Most hydraulic disc brakes have one piston on each side of the rotor, but disc brakes designed for downhill riding often have a total of four pistons to allow more braking force to be applied.
Disc brakes use a wide variety of pad designs and shapes. If you’re replacing your pads, you need to be careful that your new ones will fit your brake caliper.
Hydraulic disc brakes have the advantage that there’s no friction in the hose and so all your braking effort is transmitted to the brake.
As the hydraulic line is a closed system, there’s less maintenance required than a cable-operated brake, though the system may need bleeding occasionally if it gets contaminated. Learning how to bleed brakes is a key skill for any committed home mechanic.
The pads will also need to be replaced when they get worn or contaminated with oil or other substances, which reduce braking efficiency.
Different brands use different hydraulic fluids in their brakes. It’s important to use the right one if you need to bleed the brakes, to avoid damage and possible failure of your equipment’s seals. Boiling the brake fluid is potentially a problem with prolonged, hard braking as well.
In a cable-operated disc brake (sometimes referred to as a mechanical disc brake), the physical connection between the lever and the brake caliper is made with a wire cable.
The cable pulls a lever on the caliper, which usually pushes a pad on each side of the caliper into contact with the rotor. SRAM’s Avid cable-operated disc brakes only move the outboard brake pad. The rotor pushes against a static inboard pad.
Due to the frictional loss and stretch in the cable, cable-operated disc brakes lose out to hydraulics both in out-and-out braking force and modulation, but the best models are still more efficient than the majority of rim brakes.
Cable disc brakes are a cheaper option than hydraulic brakes, so are often found on lower-spec bikes, and are easier to fix out in the wilds.
However, most mid-to-high-end bikes with disc brakes will have a hydraulic system for good reason.
Side-pull caliper brakes were the primary choice for road bikes for decades.
They’re lightweight and can provide strong braking, although they’re much more susceptible to performance degradation in the wet than disc brakes.
Braking performance can be degraded on carbon rims in the wet too, and there’s a risk of overheating with prolonged braking on carbon brake tracks.
It’s for those reasons, plus the opportunity to fit wider road bike tyres and to make carbon rims lighter if they’re not used for braking duties, that modern road machines have moved substantially to disc brakes.
That said, a pair of well set-up rim brakes on alloy rims are more than sufficient for nearly all riders. Bikes equipped with rim brakes are also usually significantly cheaper than their disc equivalents, even if they’re hard to come by on the latest releases.
There’s a wide variety of different caliper brake designs out there, and we’ve explained some of the more common types below.
In days gone past, single-pivot caliper rim brakes were the norm.
With these, both arms rotated around a single, centred pivot, which theoretically allowed the brake to self-centre and track an out-of-true rim more effectively than a dual-pivot brake. These brakes were attached via a single bolt in the fork crown and the rear brake bridge.
Centre-pull brakes were the norm in the peloton (more on these later) until the introduction of the legendary Campagnolo Record sidepull brake in the early 1960s, which was both lighter and nearly as powerful as the centre-pull design.
Side-pull brakes quickly became favoured by the pros and, with roadies of the past just as keen to imitate the peloton as today’s riders, the demand for side-pull brakes grew massively, with most manufacturers bringing their own imitation of Campagnolo’s revolutionary brake to market, quickly marginalising the poor old centre-pull.
Campagnolo’s single-pivot design remained largely unchanged until the late 80s, when dual-pivot caliper brakes were introduced by Shimano.
Single-pivot caliper brakes are rarely seen these days because they have been superseded in almost all cases by dual-pivot caliper brakes.
Just like single-pivot brakes, dual-pivot brakes are mounted by a single bolt in the fork crown and brake bridge, but they have a yoke that attaches to this and separates the pivot points for the two arms.
This design offers greater mechanical advantage than a single-pivot design and is also far easier to centre.
Dual-pivot caliper brakes are best thought of as a combination of the actions of a centre-pull (more to come on that) and side-pull brake – the offset pivots mean that the two arms follow a similar path when the brake is applied.
A dual-pivot brake will often come in slightly heavier than a single-pivot brake, but the difference is marginal with modern, featherweight designs.
Clearance for wide tyres is typically quite limited with dual-pivot caliper brakes – you can usually squeeze in a 28mm tyre – but long-arm versions of the brakes are available for those who want to use mudguards on their road bike.
Direct-mount caliper brakes mount via posts integrated into the frame.
They’re now the norm on high-end rim brake road bikes because they can offer stronger braking, alongside increased clearances and purported – if very small – aero benefits.
While similar in appearance and mounting to some direct-mount centre-pull brakes, they are mechanically different because they’re not operated by a straddle cable.
Since the two caliper arms are not connected to each other, applying the brakes can result in the two half calipers moving apart from each other, particularly on skinny seatstays, which reduces braking efficiency and modulation. For this reason, you’ll often see a thin metal bridge connecting the two sides of the rear brake.
Bike makers went through a phase of positioning the rear direct-mount caliper under the bottom bracket. This wasn’t a good idea: the brake was in the firing line for road dirt and tended to rub against the wheel rim under heavy pedalling loads. Fortunately, it’s a thing of the past on the latest road bikes.
Centre-pull brakes operate in a similar fashion to dual-pivot caliper brakes, but are actuated by a straddle cable that is attached to both arms. Both of the pads travel in an upwards direction.
Centre-pull brakes were the norm in the peloton until the introduction of the aforementioned Campagnolo Record brake and its many imitators.
The brakes offer excellent power, modulation and generous clearances, but require additional hardware over a side-pull design (straddle cable, cable hanger) and typically weigh quite a bit more.
Centre-pull brakes have enjoyed brief periods of popularity for various purposes since then, and remained popular on cheaper road bikes and touring bikes until the early 1980s. You will most commonly see centre-pull brakes in the wild on bikes from this period.
These days, smaller manufacturers such as Rene Herse and Paul Components continue to make centre-pull brakes, with modern designs that offer generous clearances and exceptional power (especially when mounted using braze-on studs), still making them a compelling choice for touring and randonneuring bikes.
As an aside, the legendary Campagnolo Delta introduced in 1985 was (sort of) a centre-pull design and is often considered to be one of the most beautiful brakes of all time. It is still coveted by collectors of retro bike parts despite its extremely questionable functionality.
V-brakes – or direct-pull cantilever brakes by their proper name – work in a similar way to traditional cantilever brakes (see below), with the two halves bolted to bosses welded to the frame.
They are side actuated, with the cable housing fixed to one arm by way of a ‘noodle’, and the inner cable clamped to the other. As the cable is pulled through the housing, the two arms are drawn towards one another, moving the pads towards the rim.
V-brakes were introduced at a time when suspension was becoming more common and, as a V-brake system does not require a fixed cable stop on the frame or fork, they quickly became popular on mountain bikes, eventually supplanting the traditional cantilever brake in most cases.
V-brakes didn’t become widely popular for use on cyclocross bikes because the reduced clearance between the pads and rim, and the proximity of the ‘straddle’ cable and tyre, can cause issues in especially muddy conditions.
While V-brakes have been replaced by disc brakes on the vast majority of mountain bikes, they remain popular on hardy touring bikes, some hybrids and tandems, with even the biggest manufacturers offering modern brakes that are more powerful and easier to set up than ever before.
V-brakes can be prone to rubbing if they’re not cared for though, as the two sides may not pull back from the rim symmetrically if not set up right and kept clean.
V-brakes use a different cable pull ratio to cantilever brakes (cantilever brakes use the same cable pull ratio as caliper brakes) so a special long-pull lever, which pulls through roughly double the amount of cable as a regular lever, must be used.
This makes regular V-brakes incompatible with road levers without the use of a Travel Agent-style, cable pull converter. (Tektro’s RL520 brake lever and a few others are the exceptions here because they’re optimised for use with regular V-brakes.)
Short-arm, mini-V brakes that work with road levers do exist, but further exacerbate clearance issues.
Rather like the history of life on earth, the bike brake has gone through an evolutionary journey on its way to the apex stoppers that rule the world today. For the brake nerd, here’s a guide to the hopeful monsters that have roamed the earth attached to bicycles past from BikeRadar’s deputy editor, Jack Luke.
Most were destined to extinction, but a few live on in forgotten niches of the cycling world.
In a drum brake, the brake lever pulls a cable to operate pads enclosed within the hub. These are pushed outwards towards a braking surface on the inside of the hub, to slow the bike down.
The design means that the braking surface is fully enclosed and so is weather resistant. But the brake is heavy and prone to overheating. Drum brakes are a bit of a living fossil, as they’re still found in Dutch bikes and as drag brakes on older tandems, but pretty much nowhere else.
Another living fossil that lives on in bikes from the Netherlands, the coaster brake works on the rear wheel. Stop pedalling and the bike will freewheel, but turning the pedals backwards will operate the braking mechanism.
Again, the advantage is that the brake is weatherproof. It also means there’s no bar-mounted brake lever and no cabling, lowering maintenance needs. But like the drum brake, it’s heavy and prone to overheating. It’s also easy to lock up, causing skidding.
A recent extinction event has been the near-demise of the cantilever brake; it wasn’t so long ago that it was the go-to stopper on cyclocross bikes, before it was out-competed by the disc brake. You can still find cantis on some touring and tandem bikes, and they live on among die-hard cyclocross traditionalists.
The canti is a rim brake with the brake calipers screwed onto bosses on the bike’s fork blades and seatstays. There’s a separate caliper on each side, with lever arms protruding outwards, which are connected by a straddle wire. Applying the brake pulls up the straddle wire and applies the brakes.
The design has the advantages that it’s very light, gives very wide clearance and can exert a lot of leverage on the wheel rim. On the down side, setup can be tricky, resulting in poor, noisy performance if it’s not done right.
Enjoying a brief heyday in the 1980s, like a cantilever brake the U-brake is mounted to frame bosses. It has the same issues of adjustment and maintenance as a traditional cantilever and also problems with leverage, clearance and clogging. You still find U-brakes on BMX bikes though, thanks to their low profile.
Another living fossil, the hydraulic rim brake uses a hydraulic cylinder on each side to push the brake pads against the wheel rim. Magura’s H series hydraulic rim brake is still available and uses this tech, although the system is now only available for flat-bar bikes. It’s less efficient than disc brakes and has a whole lot of proprietary parts.
Roller cam brakes are a fascinating design, which is similar to a centre-pull caliper, but uses a triangular cam that moves over rollers (hence the name) in place of a straddle wire to actuate the brake arms.
This can be hard to visualise, so we recommend you have a look at this video, which shows the brakes in operation. The design is interesting because altering the shape of the cam can alter the characteristics of the braking.
Rod brakes used steel rods in place of cables to pull both sides of a braced caliper upwards, striking the inside diameter of the rim.
If you ride a bike with these brakes, you’ve most likely either nicked a bike from outside a butcher’s shop or enjoy tinkering with stationary steam engines.
When pennyfarthings with solid tyres were the acme of bike tech, spoon brakes were the stoppers of choice. Spoon brakes were practically the same as a rod brake, but used the outside diameter of the tyre as a braking surface. This is basically a more elegant version of jamming your precious shoes between your frame and wheel. Mercifully gone and forgotten.
And for the sake of the pedants out there, we do realise a fixed gear is technically speaking a brake. While we would never recommend relying solely on a fixed cog for braking (what if your chain rolls off the cog or chainring?) unless you’re on the track, and it’s not road-legal in the UK, slowing your bike down with your meaty calves is an experience worth trying.
]]>It’s been another week jam-packed full of freshly prepared, gourmet content on BikeRadar, but the weekend has arrived (and it’s another long one here in the UK, at that).
That means it’s time for another edition of First Look Friday, our weekly round-up of the latest and greatest swag to land at BikeRadar towers.
Before we get into that, though, let’s recap some of the week’s biggest stories and reviews.
Early in the week, we published a story looking at a prototype Pinarello XC bike being ridden by Team Ineos Grenadiers stars Tom Pidcock and Pauline Ferrand-Prevot.
Official details are scant, as things stand, but it looks as if the Italian brand is set to launch its first cross-country bike for over a decade.
Wahoo announced ‘Summit Freeride’. This new feature automatically detects upcoming climbs and works out a profile as you ride. It means you no longer need to load predetermined routes to get climb info.
Pirelli updated its highly rated P Zero Race 4S tyre to make it tubeless-ready. The clincher version is well regarded by the BikeRadar team as a tough yet fast-enough option for year-round road riding, but the addition of a tubeless casing makes sense given the direction of travel for road bike tyres.
In terms of wheels to mount them to, BikeRadar’s senior technical editor, Ashley Quinlan, published his review of ENVE’s new SES 4.5 wheelset, awarding them a near perfect score. They don’t come cheap, but it seems there’s little to be desired in terms of pure performance on the road.
Ahead of the 2023 Giro d’Italia, EF Education-EasyPost has announced its latest limited-edition kit.
This year’s design showcases Rapha’s Excess Collection, which uses leftover materials to create a patchwork design. Style is subjective, of course, but I think this is another great kit that pushes the boundaries of cycling kit design. Chapeau Rapha.
Lastly, our latest Bike of the Week was the Lapierre Prorace – a stealthy carbon XC bike with the brand’s signature triple-triangle rear end.
First up, we have Trek’s recently announced Ballista, a top-of-the-range aero road helmet designed for the rigours of WorldTour racing.
Replacing the previous Bontrager Ballista, the new Trek helmet sees a 10.1-watt improvement to aerodynamic efficiency at 45kph.
According to the American brand, this saving is worth “more than one bike length during a final sprint”.
The Ballista uses an elongated, almost teardrop shape with minimal venting, designed to smooth the airflow over the rider’s head and onto their back.
There’s also a groove running horizontally across the helmet towards the rear. Trek says this is designed to trip the airflow from laminar to turbulent and reduce drag.
Inside, Trek includes a MIPS Air liner, which is designed to protect your brain from rotational injury in the event of a crash or accident.
At the rear, the Ballista uses a Boa dial system to adjust the cradle tension.
On our scales, a black size medium (54-60cm) Ballista comes in at 264g, just over 9g heavier than the 255g claimed weight (for European-spec helmets – US models have a claimed weight of 275g).
Still, though, that is competitive with many other high-end aero road helmets. Specialized’s S-Works Evade 3 (£275/$300/€330), for example, weighs 272g in the same size.
At £229.99/$299.99/€299.99, the Trek Ballista is priced to compete with other flagship aero road helmets too.
First unveiled at the 2022 Tour de France, Continental’s fastest road bike tyre, the GP5000 TT TR, is now production-ready and available to average Joes as well as pros.
According to Conti, the GP5000 TT TR uses a thinner, 2-ply casing and tread to shave off weight and reduce rolling resistance. Continental says it is the fastest road tyre it has ever produced.
Compared to the Continental GP5000 S TR (which has a 3-ply casing) – one of the best tubeless road bike tyres currently available – Conti says the TT TR version can save a rider 17 seconds over a 40km time trial.
Of course, the trade-off for this improved speed will almost certainly be reduced puncture protection and durability, but these are (as the name suggests) time-trial specific tyres and that’s par for the course.
Per Conti’s recommendations, we’ve got our hands on a 700 x 25c and a 700 x 28c tyre.
When used with the narrower tyre on the front wheel and the wider one on the rear, this combination is said to provide the best balance of aerodynamic efficiency and rolling resistance.
In terms of weight, our samples tip the scales at 230g (700 x 25c) and 252g (700 x 28c) each. For context, a 700 x 28c GP5000 S TR weighs 280g.
While they may be light, these tyres aren’t cheap, coming in at £95.95/$118.95/€108.95 per tyre.
Probably not one for clocking up training miles, then, but if you’ve got a time trial bike or hill climb bike in need of some rapid rubber, these could be just the ticket.
I’ve long been a fan of Bont cycling shoes, but if there’s one area where they’ve consistently disappointed it’s been the basic included inner soles.
Thankfully, Bont looks set to finally address this oversight with its new range of Vaypor inner soles.
Produced in partnership with Cobra9, an Australian manufacturer of custom cycling orthotics, the Vaypor inner soles feature a carbon fibre core wrapped in dual-density EVA foam.
Three different colours are available (black, red and blue), with each offering different levels of arch support (low, medium and high, respectively).
As with Bont’s cycling shoes, such as the Vaypor Classic and Zero+, the inner soles are designed to minimise stack height.
This is claimed to help improve pedalling efficiency, because there is less material between the rider’s foot and the pedal.
At $99.95 per set, they’re not a cheap upgrade. However, a cheaper Riot version is also available for $39.95, which loses the option to choose a different level of arch support.
Aero socks are one of those modern cycling inventions that attract ridicule or admiring glances depending on when you wear them.
Wear them to your local time trial and almost everyone will nod approvingly, eliciting a shared sense of pride in how clever you all are.
Rolling up to your local Sunday club run in aero socks, though, risks you being the subject of the day’s jokes. Especially if either of your socks should unfortunately fall down during the ride.
Silca thinks it has the answer, though. Its aero socks are made from a traditional knitted construction, rather than the skinsuit-type materials normally used.
This means it can be far stretchier and, as a result, much less likely to fall down.
The socks get their aero credentials from the subtle chevron pattern on the rear, which is incorporated into the knit.
According to Silca, this can save anywhere between 5 and 8 watts at an unspecified, but likely fairly fast, speed.
This latest ‘Tall’ version isn’t only for tall people, it’s simply a longer version of the Aero Sock.
With a cuff length of 19.5cm and six available colours, long-sock lovers will surely be thrilled.
At €36 per pair, though, you might want to save the white versions for dry days (or be ready for the Daz Doorstep Challenge).
Protecting your head is vital in the rough-and-tumble world of mountain biking, where crashes can be an all-too-frequent occurrence. That’s why getting the best mountain bike helmet possible is hugely important to staying safe and comfortable.
We’ve rounded up our pick of the best trail helmets currently on sale, plus our advice on what to look for when you’re buying a new lid.
We also have a list of the best enduro helmets if you’re looking for full-face mountain bike helmets, and another looking at the best road helmets if you ride on tarmac. We also have a buyer’s guide to the best kids’ bike helmets.
Stacked with features, the 4Forty is pretty affordable. The large vents mean it has impressive airflow over the top of the head to help reduce heat build-up on long climbs.
We found its shape is well-suited to those with rounder heads and the fit system is easy to adjust with an indexed dial on the back of the lid.
The peak adjusts high enough for goggle parking, too.
The Fox Speedframe Pro is a comfy and airy helmet that was near-perfect in our testing and received full marks from independent safety assessors.
The adjustable peak wards off the sun and should fit most types of googles (on or off the face) without causing them to steam up.
Both straps and buckles are easy to tighten and undo one-handed. The sole issue is the lack of a crash-replacement policy.
The Giro Manifest Spherical is noticeably more breezy than other trail helmets, even at lower speeds, thanks to its highly ventilated design.
There’s a decent amount of coverage, and despite this, it’s still impressively light.
The tension around the head feels nice and we suffered zero hotspots during testing. The padding is thick enough to keep things comfortable and absorbs enough sweat to avoid any dripping.
There’s no getting away from the price and, while the safety features are great, they are the same as the less expensive Giro Tyrant. However, because of how well it performs, it has become a go-to for our tester.
The Tyrant helmet from Giro represents a new-school attitude to trail riding, where more protection is a must-have at the expense of a little weight and heat dissipation.
It uses a MIPS Spherical system to help protect your brain in a crash and offers lots of low-down protection at the rear thanks to its design.
It can get a bit hot on prolonged, slow climbs, but we think it’s a price worth paying for the extra coverage on offer.
The Lazer Chiru MIPS helmet has an exceptionally comfortable, neutral fit and doesn’t bounce around when you’re wearing it over rough terrain. The retention system provides incremental adjustment.
It’s a very safe helmet thanks to its MIPS protection.
The helmet is fairly hot, although not unbearably so, and some larger-framed glasses may not be compatible. But despite these niggles, there is much to like about the Chiru.
The Scott Stego Plus is easy on the eye and the head thanks to superb comfort. Ventilation is very effective and brow vents funnel air to clear goggle lens fog.
The high-lifting, adjustable peak provides a place to stash googles when they’re not in use.
The Scott Stego Plus comprehensively covers your head from impact, but bear in mind Scott won’t replace your helmet if you do crash.
The Smith Session MIPS helmet uses a combination of two third-party protection technologies for safety: MIPS to reduce rotation impact and Koroyd, which crumples to absorb the forces caused by impact.
These features don’t get in the way of ventilation, and the helmet provides great cooling. The downside is that the large vents did make it easy for bugs to fly in while testing.
The retention system is easy to adjust, vertically and with the index wheel, and the helmet didn’t move around too much even with goggles stowed on top.
The Smith Session MIPS helmet has a host of features and, although it’s fairly pricey, it does offer good value for money.
The Troy Lee Designs A3 is TLD’s premium trail helmet and builds on the success of the A1 and A2, which both set a benchmark when it came to mountain bike helmet design.
The A3 is an iconic TLD shape, and TLD hasn’t scrimped on safety either. The helmet uses two layers of foam to protect you against different impact speeds and employs a MIPS liner too. It was given a five-star rating by the Virginia Tech Helmet Ratings project.
Wearing the A3 out on the trail, there is a decent breeze over your head and the magnetic visor doesn’t rattle around as on some other helmets. It’s a bit heavier than some, but it is extremely comfortable, and we’d argue it’s worth the price tag.
A sharp and sleek design makes this helmet a lot less bulky than others, and the well-placed padding ensures the Flowline is comfortable on long rides.
The ventilation works well, with our tester finding the removable pads worked well in soaking up sweat.
The Flowline is compatible with many riding glasses, with the helmet’s straps sitting comfortably over their arms and space under the peak to store them.
The Bell Super Air Spherical uses two layers of EPS foam for impact protection, with the outer layer being denser to take the sting out of high-speed impacts.
Our tester found the Ionic+ padding and 360-degree retention system kept the helmet comfy on long days out.
With 17 vents, the helmet also works well at cooling your head – though not all vents penetrate through the inner EPS layer.
The helmet can be converted into a lightweight full-face helmet with the purchase of an £89.99 chin bar.
For the price, the B’Twin All Mountain is an impressive lid, offering plenty of coverage, staying comfortable on long rides and refusing to budge over rough terrain.
It’s compatible with plenty of riding glasses, but lacks an adjustable retention cradle seen on most other lids. As long as you buy the right-sized helmet for your head, this shouldn’t be a problem.
Although we didn’t mind its looks, they might not be to everyone’s tastes.
The Endura SingleTrack II is the lightest and the cheapest helmet in the list, scoring a creditable four stars.
The huge front and side vents bring welcome ventilation. The highest of the peak levels can hold googles and dropping it down keeps out low winter sun.
Endura will replace the helmet if you crash within three years of purchase, for 50 per cent off the RRP.
Like the Giro Tyrant, the Fox Dropframe is another example of the new-school open-face, extra-coverage trail lids that look similar to full-face helmets with the chin bar removed.
Lids that look like this tend to divide opinion, but there’s no denying the extra protection is attractive.
The Dropframe doesn’t have MIPS, but does feature a dual-density EPS shell. And because it doesn’t have an adjustable retention cradle, its fit can only be adjusted by changing the pads, so trying before you buy is essential.
The Fixture is a bit of a bargain, considering the amount of tech on offer. It’s got MIPS and an adjustable fit system with a one-size-fits-all design that spans between 54 and 61cm.
Although the visor is fixed and the interior padding isn’t as plush as some lids, for the price the Fixture is a great performer.
The Oakley DRT5 may look plain, with a sole pad to cushion the back of your head and only a silicone seal for your forehead.
But it’s actually extremely comfy and the absence of bulky padding reduces risk of overheating. Should you warm up, the seal also prevents sweat dripping down your face.
This performance comes with a weight and price penalty, but Oakley does offer 50 per cent off replacements within three years of the original purchase.
The POC Kortal Race MIPS is a pricey helmet, but POC has managed to pack in lots of features and safety tech, which makes it an attractive package.
The helmet features MIPS technology and has plenty of coverage to keep your head protected. There is also a chip in the helmet, which can store all your medical information if the worst does happen.
The retention system wraps around the whole head, which minimises the chance of any hot spots, and overall we found the Kortal Race comfortable to wear.
The venting in the helmet does a good job of circulating air around your head on warm days.
The Tectal Race SPIN NFC is an older helmet from POC, but it still packs plenty of attractive features and has a 5-star rating for safety from Virginia Tech.
The helmet uses SPIN technology, which is a proprietary safety technology that POC used for a number of years. The brand is now transitioning to using MIPS in its helmets.
Elsewhere, the helmet has an NFC chip that can store your medical information, and we found this easy to set up.
The helmet is comfortable to wear, but we would like to see it have a few more vents for better air circulation.
The Sweet Protection Trailblazer has a multi-piece shell with different thicknesses and shapes to best protect your head. It also uses MIPS technology to minimise rotational force causing damage on impact.
When it comes to fit, the Trailblazer has an index dial that is easy to adjust. It comes with two thicknesses of pads, which unlike other helmets you can distinctly feel. The helmet feels secure when going over bumps.
This helmet has 16 vents, but we found ventilation to be fairly average, making this a cool-weather helmet. We also found it difficult to use this helmet with large goggles. This means it’s not the most versatile, which might put you off paying the full £160 price.
The best mountain bike trail helmets manage to balance the often-competing needs of protection, ventilation, comfort and weight.
Helped by the rise in popularity of enduro racing, many open-face lids now offer greater coverage around the back of the head and the temples than cross-country or road-style helmets, helping to boost protection.
Unless you care about every single gram or really want ultimate cooling, that makes them a sensible bet for the majority of riders.
Most bike helmets use some form of expanded polystyrene, or EPS foam, formed around a core of another, tougher material to provide cushioning in the event of an impact.
The foam crushes when it’s struck, spreading and delaying the force of the impact being transmitted to the wearer, hopefully to a level that will prevent injury.
While the impact resistance of helmets is covered by a number of test standards to ensure they perform when they’re needed, manufacturers have been introducing extra technology to try to improve on this.
One such technology is MIPS (multi-directional impact protection system), which uses a floating plastic liner between the head and the EPS structure, which reduces the amount of rotational force transmitted to the brain during a crash.
Rotational force is responsible for a large number of injuries, including brain damage, so while it makes manufacturing, and thus retail, prices more expensive, many manufacturers now incorporate MIPS into their helmets.
Most bicycle helmets now have a hard plastic outer moulded to the EPS structure. This is known as in-moulding and provides protection against minor bumps and scratches that would otherwise damage the EPS.
On cheaper helmets, this tends to be limited to the top and sides of the helmet. More expensive, fully in-moulded helmets extend the plastic protection down and around the rim, making it much more effective at fending off damage.
While the extra coverage of trail-style helmets is more than welcome, it does get in the way of airflow, which can mean a much warmer and sweatier head in hot weather or when you’re pushing really hard.
Happily, thanks to the increasingly clever use of materials and design, it’s now possible to make a lid that’s almost as cool as a conventional design.
Having lots of vents is important, but it’s the internal channels that help airflow in through the front, over the head and out the back that makes all the difference.
Look for big vents on the front and rear, with deep channels on the inside of the lid.
How well a helmet fits will depend on the size and shape of your head. Many people tend to get on with certain brands that use a particular shape, but finding the right one is very much a case of trial and error.
If possible, go to your local bike shop to see how you get on with different lids or ask your friends if you can try theirs.
The main thing is to ensure you can get the helmet sitting securely on your head so there are no pressure points or undue movement.
Most helmets will have a retention system of some kind to allow you to adjust how tightly it fits onto your head. Many of these will tighten and loosen around the circumference of the head, although some also adjust in other ways.
However it works, make sure you can operate the system easily in gloves and that it doesn’t trap hair or pinch flesh.
Also ensure that you can adjust the straps to get a solid fit that’s not restrictive and that when fully adjusted you have a clear, unobstructed view, especially when you’re in an aggressive, head-down riding position.
Check that the peak can be adjusted so that it keeps the sun out of your eyes without getting in the way or flapping about when you ride. If you like to ride wearing sunglasses for mountain biking, make sure they fit comfortably with the lid.
While weight might seem like a minor consideration compared with a helmet’s other characteristics, a lightweight helmet will be a much more pleasant place to be after a long day on the bike.
A light lid is much less likely to move about as you ride, too.
A number of helmets on the market now come with a chin guard that can be removed. This is largely in response to the growth in enduro racing, where long climbs benefit from an open-face lid to help you breathe and stay cool, while gnarly descents mean the additional protection from a full-face-style lid is desirable.
With a removable chin guard, riders get the best of both worlds.
The compromise is often weight because, if the helmet has full ASTM downhill certification (so it can be used as a DH race helmet), there needs to be extra protection built in. Not all of the convertible helmets meet this standard, though.
Whether you choose a convertible helmet is up to you, but we’re definitely seeing more on the trails these days.
If you love to record and share your rides online, then you’ll be pleased to know that more and more manufacturers are integrating removable camera mounts into their helmets.
These allow a secure fitting for your camera, but also mean you can go back to having an unfettered helmet when you want to.
Many enduro-style lids also allow you to use mountain bike goggles to provide almost impregnable eye protection. Look for helmets with a peak that lifts up high enough for you to be able to fit the goggles underneath and a strap of some kind at the back to keep them secure
]]>The latest Turbo Levo SL II electric mountain bike from Specialized has undergone some major updates.
The frame has been redesigned to remove its sidearm, while also offering more geometry adjustability and being incorporated into the S-sizing system.
In addition, the bike boasts 150mm of rear-wheel travel and a 160mm-travel fork. It comes equipped with mixed-wheel sizes as standard.
The Turbo Levo SL II now features a new motor – the Turbo SL 1.2 – which is claimed to deliver 33 per cent more power and 43 per cent more torque compared to the previous SL 1.1 motor.
This new electric bike motor is said to have a perceived noise reduction of 34 to 45 per cent.
The kinematics have also been adjusted to improve overall trail performance, and the new bikes come with updated custom RX shock tunes for the kinematics.
There are two models being released, the £13,000/$14,000/€14,000 Turbo Levo SL II S-Works, and the £7,000/$8,000/€7,900 Turbo Levo SL II Comp Carbon. We expect further models to be announced at a later date.
Like any new electric bike with an updated motor, we all want to know what’s ‘under the hood’. The Turbo SL 1.2 motor dishes out 50Nm torque with a peak power of 320W.
That’s increased from 35Nm and 240W delivered by the previous Turbo SL 1.1 motor and aligns with other current lightweight electric bike motors such as the TQ HPR 50 and Fazua Ride 60.
This means the new Turbo Levo SL II will provide more assistance to make climbs feel less of a chore.
The Turbo Levo SL II uses a non-removable 320Wh battery. You can also add a 180Wh range extender that fits into the bike’s bottle cage for a maximum 480Wh capacity.
There’s also a new two-piece motor housing with an integrated honeycomb structure to help dissipate noise. The gearbox has been redesigned to reduce noise further. The motor is IP67 rated, meaning it can be submerged in up to one metre of water for 30 minutes.
Specialized claims the motor has a wide optimised cadence range of support, with anywhere between 70 and 100rpm ideal. Specialized has yet to present a motor weight, but a size S4 S-Works Turbo Levo SL weighs 17.67kg, so it can’t be too hefty.
The drive unit modes include Eco, Trial, Turbo, Walk and Micro Tune. Eco, Trail and Turbo are pre-set power modes that can be adjusted in Specialized’s Misson Control app. Micro Tune is a method that can change the power output in 10 per cent jumps to tailor the power to suit your ride and situation from the remote.
Specialized’s MasterMind TCU (Turbo Control Unit) is at the heart of rider interaction with the bike. This fits neatly into the top tube and shows the rider various metrics. It’s available on all carbon models.
It can display modes, battery capacity, speed, time, distance, elevation metrics analysed through a barometer, power output (motor and rider) and estimated range. If you connect via Bluetooth or ANT+, you can see heart rate data too. It will also display functions on other devices.
The unit can supply more data, including slope angle and average 20-minute battery consumption. In addition, it can work as a security device by locking the motor.
If you want to customise your power settings, you can use the Mission Control app to tune the support, peak power output and acceleration response from the motor for each of the Eco, Trail and Turbo modes.
Updates to the system can be downloaded and installed ‘Over the Air’ via Bluetooth and the Mission Control app. There is no need to connect cables to your bike to install the latest system updates.
While the Turbo Levo SL II has a motor to aid assistance on the climbs, Specialized says it still believes the bike’s frame and suspension play a key role in how it behaves and feels on the trail.
This is where Specialized claims to have spent much of its time trying to improve the rider experience.
The frames use Specialized FACT11 carbon fibre, which employs FEA (Finite Element Analysis) and machine learning to help optimise material usage, carbon layup and shape to refine lateral, torsional and bottom-bracket stiffness.
Specialized says it tuned the whole chassis (front and rear triangles and links) under its Rider-First Engineered process to ensure each of the six frame sizes delivers the same on-trail experience.
In addition, Specialized removed its sidebar to save weight and meet its stiffness needs as the frames grow longer with the updated geometry.
The other frame details are what you would expect to see on modern trail bikes. It uses 12x148mm Boost rear-hub spacing. In addition, there’s space for a bottle cage in the front triangle that can hold your water bottle or the 180W range extender.
There’s plenty of frame protection around the chainstays and a SRAM Universal Derailleur Hanger interface to fit the latest SRAM Eagle AXS Transmission.
What’s missing from this latest Turbo Levo SL II is internal cable routing through the headset. Some might consider this a blessing, but I expect the next Turbo Levo SL model will feature this.
There are also no additional bosses for tool and tube storage. However, you do get a Specialized SWAT multi-tool in the steerer tube.
Specialized has reworked the kinematics and shock tunes for this new frame. The aim was to balance a bike that’s plush enough to keep you calm tackling the chunkiest lines while still having enough playfulness to keep you engaged on flowing terrain.
Specialized flattened and lowered the Turbo Levo SL II’s leverage curve. As a result, the bike is less progressive at sag, which should help you find traction. However, it’s more progressive in the last 30mm of travel to provide greater support in bottom-out situations.
Compared to the previous Levo SL, the bike’s kinematics rely more on damping support from the shock rather than the spring rate in bottom-out situations. Specialized has also reduced the rebound damping in the shock so it can recover faster and keep the bike higher in its travel with more suspension reserved for bigger hits.
A slightly more rearward axle path is used to help improve bump absorption by better aligning bump force with wheel-travel direction. This also links to a higher anti-squat to give the bike a more stable pedalling platform.
The new frame (except size S1) is also compatible with select coil shocks. Examples include the Fox DHX, Öhlins TTX Coil, and RockShox Super Deluxe Coil.
Let’s first talk about the sizes, because there are plenty of geometry details to explore with the Turbo Levo SL II’s adjustability.
The Turbo Levo SL II was Specialized’s last performance mountain bike to be integrated into its S-Sizing concept. As a result, the new bike is available in six sizes, from the smallest S1 to the largest S6.
For those who aren’t aware, S-Sizing is designed to enable riders to choose their frame size based on riding style and the terrain they ride most often. Consequently, frames are built with similar standover heights but lengthening front centres.
If you prefer a shorter, more playful bike, choose a smaller size. On the other hand, if you like a more stable and planted bike, size up. Most riders should have at least two, and maybe three, frame sizes to consider.
The S1 is unique in the Turbo Levo SL II line-up. While S2 to S6 bikes have 160mm forks and 150mm rear travel, the S1 has a 150mm fork and 144mm rear travel to maximise standover height. It also doesn’t use a piggyback shock like the other sizes.
The Turbo Levo SL II has received a geometry update, resulting in a longer, slacker and lower design. The new bike has myriad adjustability, just like the Specialized Stumpjumper EVO. First, however, we’ll cover the standard bike settings, which include the low shock yoke setting, 27.5in Horst-link positions and standard headset cups.
Reach numbers range from 405mm to 425mm, 445mm, 470mm, 495mm and 525mm on the S1 to S6. If we take the S4 to represent the old size large, the reach is 15mm longer at 470mm compared to 455mm.
The head tube angle is now 64.5 degrees. That’s 1.5 degrees slacker than the old bike. The effective seat tube angle is a not-so-steep 75.8 degrees across all sizes. However, this is 1.2 degrees steeper than the previous bike when compared to the size L.
The bottom bracket sits 2mm lower with an offset of 29mm below the front wheel. The standover heights between the S2 and S6 sizes increase only by 15mm from 763mm to 778mm. However, the seat tubes jump 80mm in 20mm increments, from 385mm on the S1 to 465mm on the S6.
The S1 frame has a lower standover height of 727mm, but shares the same 385mm seat tube length as the S2 size.
The chainstay lengths are a nimble 432mm across all sizes.
Specialized Turbo Levo SL II | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Size | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 |
Reach (mm) | 405 | 425 | 445 | 470 | 495 | 525 |
Head angle (degrees) | 64.5 | 64.5 | 64.5 | 64.5 | 64.5 | 64.5 |
Seat tube angle (degrees) | 75.8 | 75.8 | 75.8 | 75.8 | 75.8 | 75.8 |
Seat tube (mm) | 385 | 385 | 405 | 425 | 445 | 465 |
Chainstay (mm) | 433 | 432 | 432 | 432 | 432 | 432 |
Wheelbase (mm) | 1,158 | 1,184 | 1,208 | 1,238 | 1,267 | 1,301 |
Bottom bracket offset (mm) | 343 | 348 | 348 | 348 | 348 | 348 |
Stack (mm) | 609 | 617 | 626 | 635 | 645 | 654 |
Top tube (mm) | 560 | 582 | 604 | 631 | 659 | 691 |
Standover (mm) | 727 | 763 | 766 | 767 | 773 | 778 |
If you’re unsatisfied with those dimensions, the Turbo Levo SL II has a few tricks up its sleeve to tailor the bike to your riding style and needs.
The bike comes with 1-degree headset cups that you can swap to steepen or slacken the head tube angle.
There is also a flip chip in the shock yoke. The bike comes as standard in the low setting, but you can switch this to raise the bottom bracket 5mm and steepen the head tube and effective seat tube by approximately 0.5 degrees.
The Horst (chainstay/seatstay) pivot has a second flip chip. This enables you to run a 29in rear wheel while keeping the geometry standard. However, it increases the chainstay length by 10mm to 443mm.
All these combinations give 12 geometry charts, but check below for an overview of how these different adjustments work.
Initially, Specialized is releasing two models of the Turbo Levo SL II and has shared details for the Turbo Levo SL II S-Works and Turbo Levo SL II Comp Carbon. We expect more models to be released, but these are the details we have so far.
The good news is prices haven’t increased, and the S-Works model is £700 cheaper than previously.
I was invited by Specialized to the UK’s media camp to test the S-Works Turbo Levo SL II in not-so-sunny Wales. Conditions were very wet, with plenty of rain but some sunny spells.
We clocked up two rides, which I recorded, as did the bike. The first ride totalled 27.8km, with 750m of climbing and 950m of descending. The stats for the second ride were 17.5km, with 740m ascending and descending.
Using a mix of Eco, Trail, and Turbo modes, I finished the first day with 25 per cent battery remaining and the second day with 37 per cent. I only used the main battery without the range extender.
The first day covered a more trail-oriented ride around the lesser-known trails of Coed y Brenin. The second day took in a more direct winch-and-plummet ride around the natural trails of Dyfi Forest.
From the first pedal strokes, it’s noticeable how quiet the motor is in Eco and Trail modes. There’s a slight hum in Turbo, but it’s quieter than a standard full-power ebike motor. The new gearbox and casing do the trick.
The motor has enough power in all modes to take the sting out of climbing. I could pedal up comfortably while chatting away.
Setting the Turbo mode to 100 per cent assistance and power, the full 50Nm torque and 320W, there’s enough punch in the motor to grind up some savage climbs. I negotiated some steep, technical terrain and I was thoroughly impressed with the performance of the motor. You can rely on it heavily to winch you up some gruelling grades.
Your pace will be slower than a more powerful electric mountain bike, but it’ll do the job.
While the effective seat tube angle isn’t as steep as most bikes released in the last year, and the chainstays on the mixed-wheel bike are short, it’s still easy to keep the front wheel tracking on steep climbs. I didn’t feel as though the front wheel wanted to loop out.
That might be due to the middling reach values contributing to a moderate effective top tube length that let me keep weight on the front wheel. I still needed to lean forwards a little, but not more than usual.
The suspension was supple enough to provide plenty of traction when climbing wet rocky slopes, without sapping energy from the motor or rider. On smoother trails, it’s easy to reach the shock’s climb switch to maximise efficiency.
Still, I could ride easily with the shock open for climbing and descending, and not worry about excessive pedal bob.
I weighed a size S4 Turbo Levo SL II S-Works at 17.67kg (no pedals). While I tested an S3, the weights will be close. Once on the trails, with gravity helping you out, that weight is mostly unnoticeable, and it’s hard to tell you’re on an ebike.
Moving the bike around on the trail didn’t take a noticeable amount of extra input, and braking points weren’t remarkably different, which I sometimes notice on ebikes over 20kg.
The fact that the weight is low in the frame helps keep the bike stable and makes it feel hunkered down to the ground. While it’s only marginal, the extra unsprung mass helps reduce trail buzz and vibrations coming through the suspension. Maybe the Specialized RX shock tune does a respectable job here too.
The times I still felt aware I was on an ebike were on moderately flat trails where you’re above the motor cut-out speed but still need to pedal to keep momentum. These sections of the trail seem harder work than keeping and generating speed on my regular non-assisted bikes, even if the weights are within a kilo or two.
I would like a size S3.5, but I would always size down rather than size up when deciding what size bike I need. The handling of the S3 was impressive. I rode one day with the stock headset cups at 64.5 degrees and one day with the -1-degree cups that changed the head tube angle to 64 degrees.
There wasn’t a massive change in handling feel, and in both settings, the bike’s overall handling was fun and agile. I could weave through awkward sections of trail without hesitation, and positioning the bike on the trail where I wanted was easy.
The suspension was impressive too, and Specialized has managed to balance a supple beginning stroke with support deeper in the travel, without having a harsh ramp-up.
Whether through chassis design, suspension tuning or the sprung-to-unsprung weight ratio, but probably a combination of all three, the bike is very composed on the trail. It transfers little feedback to the rider.
That helped me feel comfortable and confident to push hard from the start and take advantage of the engaging ride character.
The Turbo Levo SL II S-Works was impressive over various trails, from mellow trail centre runs to steep and wild tech. As a trail bike goes, this is a great all-rounder.
]]>If you thought the tech well at Sea Otter 2023 had run dry, you were wrong, because here we are with our final round-up from the Californian show.
And it’s a corker, if we do say so ourselves, with some of the finest bike jewellery we spotted during our time in the States, a bunch of new products, throwback tech, quirky gadgets and more.
So strap yourselves in for our highlights from 5DEV, Vittoria, TRP, Turner, Boyd, Hayes, Cane Creek, Maxxis, Fox and more.
5DEV’s stand stopped a lot of people in their tracks at Sea Otter, owing to the heavily machined cranks, chainrings, stems and pedals on show.
5DEV is a bike components brand born out of 5th Axis, a CNC machining company making complex parts for a wide range of industries.
The co-founders of 5th Axis have been riding bikes for years – since head tube angles were 71 degrees, they say – and are now combining that passion with the machining expertise of 5th Axis.
Anyway, 5DEV’s new titanium cranks caught our eye initially at Sea Otter, thanks to their wild lattice design – and the fact they’re made from titanium, of course.
The cranks on display were prototype versions, but they’ll be going into production soon. They’re cut from a solid block of titanium and the machining here is seriously impressive.
Of course, it’s all entirely unnecessary, but if you’re looking for some bike jewellery for your ride, then you’ve got it here.
The cranks weigh 530g, including the spindle, or 600g with 5DEV’s new titanium chainring. Both use an eight-bolt direct-mount design, compatible with SRAM’s latest T-Type Transmission drivetrains. SRAM switched to eight-bolt to offer compatibility with Quarq power meters.
We’re not sure about the pricing for the cranks at the moment.
The chainrings are available in 30t and 32t sizes, in a raw finish, bronze, purple or teal. If you’re paying for titanium chainrings, then you’ve got to choose the raw finish, haven’t you? Yours for $199.99.
5DEV also offers a heavily machined titanium stem, with a 40mm option now available alongside the 32mm and 48mm versions. The stems fit 35mm bars, or 31.8mm bars with a shim (provided). Again, there are four finishes to choose from.
The 5DEV Titanium Stem costs $399.99.
The 48mm stem was fitted to a Specialized Diverge STR gravel bike at Sea Otter. That’s short, as far as gravel stems are concerned, so 5DEV is also working on 70mm, 80mm and 90mm options.
Finally, before we move on, 5DEV also works with aluminium. The road/gravel crank pictured is aluminium, as are the brand’s mountain bike pedals.
The $189.99 All Around Pedal has pins on the outside of the pedal, for riders who want to make quick foot adjustments.
The $249.99 Trail/Enduro pedal has additional pins in the middle of the pedal, as well as machined indents on the arms of the pedal body, for extra grip.
Vittoria used Sea Otter to launch a new tyre liner, the Air-Liner Light, designed for cross-country, downcountry and trail riding, according to the Italian brand.
Vittoria already has the Air-Liner MTB in its range, so the Air-Liner Light comes in – yep, you guessed it – and a lightweight option. And it is impressively light – a claimed 50g.
Two-time Olympic XC champion and five-time world champion, Julien Absalon, has been testing this for Vittoria, which gives you an idea of the type of riding the Air-Liner Light is aimed at.
Whereas the existing Air-Liner MTB has a figure of 8 shape, flipped on its side, the Air-Liner Light has a diamond profile. This, Vittoria says, is designed to improve the stability of the tyre, particularly given the lightweight tyre casings this insert is most likely to be paired with.
This, in turn, is said to improve puncture protection and the suspension characteristics of the liner. “The unique foam of the Air-Liner Light provides a ‘limitless travel’ feeling to the tyre compression which increases comfort, grip, and speed,” according to Vittoria.
Vittoria says the Air-Liner Light is designed to fit 29×2.1in to 29×2.4in tyres, on wheels with a rim width of 25-30mm.
While we’re talking tyre inserts, CushCore launched the Trail insert at Sea Otter, designed to sit between its Pro and XC options. Go and check that out in our day one round-up.
Sea Otter saw a number of drivetrain challenger brands exhibit in a continued attempt to muscle market share from Shimano and SRAM.
Tom Marvin’s already covered new nine-speed parts from Box Components, aimed at providing an affordable alternative, while TRP had its new EVO12 drivetrain on display.
We reported on the launch of EVO12 in March, but this was the first time we’d seen the 12-speed mechanical drivetrain in the flesh. There’s also a seven-speed version for downhill racing.
With SRAM and Shimano continuing to focus on high-end electronic groupsets, could TRP provide an alternative for mountain bikers who want the tactile feel – and lower cost – of cables? We’ve got an EVO12 en-route to BikeRadar HQ for review so will find out how it performs.
If you’re not familiar, TRP – Tektro Racing Products – was founded in 2006 as the high-end components of Tektro, the brakes brand that makes millions of brakes each year. Therefore, this is a company with scale and expertise when it comes to manufacturing.
EVO12 supersedes TRP’s TR12 rear derailleur and shifter kit. Here, we’ve got a complete drivetrain, with TRP making almost everything in-house, including the crankset and cassette. The chain comes from KMC.
The new cassette is a two-piece design, with a 10-52t range (10-11-13-15-18-21-24-28-32-36-44-52).
The bottom 10 sprockets are made from steel, for improved durability, while the two largest sprockets are made from aluminium, to reduce weight. The cassette is compatible with Microspline freehubs, but not XD drivers.
The carbon crankset is also new and is available in 165mm and 170mm crank lengths, spinning on a 30mm aluminium axle. There’s a forged aluminium version, too.
Elsewhere, TRP says the shifter ergonomics have been improved, with a lighter lever action compared to TR12. It’s Matchmaker compatible. One of the neat features here is the option to toggle the shifter between one upshift per click or five, using a small switch on the underside of the unit.
As for the rear derailleur, Tektro says it now shifts on a horizontal parallelogram, compared to the more angular actuation of the TR12 derailleur, and it’s a stiffer design.
TRP’s Hall Lock feature remains. It’s effectively an on/off lever that, when ‘on’, locks the B-knuckle in place to secure the derailleur body, and reduce chain movement and drivetrain noise. The Hall Lock can be turned off to remove the rear wheel. There’s also a clutch.
Finally, before we get on to pricing, all EVO12 components are available in the gold-black finish pictured, as well as an all-black option.
Turner is well-known for its titanium mountain bikes and the Scrub, an “aggro-enduro hardtail”, is the California-based brand’s latest model.
The Scrub has had the low, long and slack treatment, getting a 64.5-degree head angle, a 76-degree seat angle, 435mm chainstays, and 440mm and 465mm of reach for the Regular and Tall sizes respectively.
“The wheelbase is plenty long so when going full gas down bombed-out enduro runs, the Scrub will provide plenty of security,” adds Turner.
The frame is designed to be built around a 150-160mm fork, while the top tube is intentionally low to boost standover heigh and increase seatpost insertion, to 280mm in the Regular size and 320mm in the Tall size.
Turner says the frame’s tubes have been “beefed up” to withstand the hard riding the Scrub is designed for, and there are also gussets in high-stress areas. Tyre clearance comes in at 29×2.5in or 27.5×2.8in.
Turner says the Scrub will be available from mid-May. Pricing is to be confirmed.
We covered Boyd’s new aluminium road wheelset, the Altamont, in one of our drop-bar round-ups from Sea Otter, but there was also a new MTB wheelset on display at Sea Otter in the form of the Bracken.
As we covered with the Altamont, this is wrapped up into the news that Boyd has brought its production of aluminium wheels back to the United States, at a facility close to its headquarters in Greenville, South Carolina.
The Bracken, designed for enduro riding, has a 30mm internal width, hookless rims and reinforced wall thickness for 2.4in tyres and beyond.
Claimed weight is 1,850g for the set and they’re priced at $725.
MTB nostalgia is having a bit of a moment, with recent gravel bikes from Canyon and Vielo sporting paint inspired by the early days of mountain biking.
And that continues here with a new, limited-edition run of purple Hayes Dominion A4 brakes.
If you’re of a certain age, you might remember some of the top teams of the late 1990s, including Specialized-Mountain Dew, Volvo-Cannondale, Trek-Volkswagen, Tomac Racing, Maxxis, Foes, Fisher, Be-One Racing, Haro and Mongoose, using Champagne-coloured brakes with purple logos. This then evolved into a Purple Hayes release to the public in 2000.
The 2023 Purple Hayes brakes apply the anodised finish to a standard set of Dominion A4 brakes, with a four-piston actuation, 17mm pistons, and 160mm, 180mm and 203mm rotor compatibility. Claimed weight is 310g per brake.
You can get hold of these for $249.49 (that’s the same price as the regular Dominion A4 brakes), limited to 500 sets worldwide.
Ergon had the new GDH Team grips to show us.
These are a new addition to the German brand’s gravity collection and are described as a “Frankenstein” option for enduro/downhill, combining features from Ergon’s existing grips.
That includes the soft box-like pattern on the top of the grips, inspired by Ergon’s GD1 Evo, and the ribbed lines on the underside, similar to the GFR1. This is designed to boost finger grip.
Finally, the CNC’d clamp and inner flange are borrowed from the GD1.
Ergon says the grips were designed in collaboration with Vali Höll, Troy Brosnan and Jesse Melamed.
They will be available this summer, costing around $40.
Cane Creek has redesigned its Air IL and Coil IL shocks to offer improved suspension performance, increased reliability and better compatibility with a wider range of trail bikes, according to the brand.
The new shocks have thicker inner damper tubes for increased strength, Cane Creek claims, and slimmer valve bodies and air cans for additional frame clearance.
The Air IL and Coil IL continue to use Cane Creek’s twin-tube damper layout, which allows for four-way independent adjustment of the damper (high-speed compression, low-speed compression, high-speed rebound, low-speed rebound).
The shocks now have a 3mm Allen key nested in the climb switch and held in place by two magnets, for damper adjustments.
Cane Creek has increased the maximum pressure for Air IL to 350psi, while the Coil IL now has preload adjustment with three detents for, the brand says, more precise spring rate tuning.
Claimed weights are 385g for the Air IL and 280g for the Coil IL, and they are priced at $629.99 and $579.99 respectively.
Here’s a neat little gadget from 12-Speed Products, the Door Mate.
It’s a garage door remote for road and mountain bikes, with the former integrated into a bar-end plug (which looks similar to a Di2 junction box) and the latter designed to sit on the headset stem cap or handlebar.
Apparently, it can be programmed to work with 85 per cent of garage doors in the US, Mexico, Canada and New Zealand. It’s not currently available in the UK due to different garage door technology.
However, if you live in one of the above places and want to be able to open your garage door from your bike without fumbling around for a key fob, you’re in luck.
It weighs 0.5oz/16g, is powered by a replaceable A27 battery said to offer one year of battery life, is IP65 water and dust resistant and, according to 12-Speed Products, has a range of 50ft/15m. Oh and it costs $39.99.
From one quirky product to another, this is the Branchy, a rear derailleur guard for mountain biking, gravel riding and, well, another other type of riding where you’re worried about your derailleur being damaged or ripped off by an impact.
It’s made, according to Branchy, from an impact-resistant thermoplastic designed to retain some flexibility to absorb and deflect impact, and weighs 35g.
The Branchy attaches to the chainstay with a couple of zip-ties.
It’s yours for a cool €64.95. Let us know your thoughts on this one.
If you like to ride with your phone, then Peak Design’s case and mount setup looks like a smart option.
Peak Design now offers smartphone cases for iPhone, Samsung and Google Pixel devices. It’s a neat-looking case in its own right and uses Peak Design’s SlimLink mounting system.
This is essentially a mechanical and magnetic lock built into the case, which then attaches your phone to a wide range of Peak Design mounts.
For riding, that includes an out-front bike mount, while there are also various car mounts, charging mounts, tripods and the like, so you can use the same system across your bike and anywhere else you need to hold your phone steady.
We covered this one upon the launch of Maxxis’ new XC tyres but it’s worth another look, seeing as Sea Otter was our first chance to see the Severe in the rubber.
The Maxxis Severe uses a new compound dubbed MaxxSpeed, said to increase wet-weather grip while also lowering rolling resistance by 25 per cent, compared to the MaxxSpeed 3C compound.
With the Olympic Games coming up once again next summer, XC is hotting up right now, with big bike launches coming in the form of the Specialized Epic World Cup (Pinarello has an XC prototype up its sleeve, too). We can expect plenty more new XC tech over the coming months.
The Maxxis Severe is designed specifically for wet and muddy conditions and, as well as that new compound, there’s a new tread pattern that was apparently tested on the World Cup circuit last year by the likes of Nino Schurter and Bec Henderson.
It’s available in two sizes (29×2.25in and 27.5×2.25in), with Maxxis sticking to the slightly narrower width to cut through mud, despite the trend for wider rubber in XC.
The new Maxxis Severe costs $93.
Fox now covers riders head-to-toe having launched the Union shoes earlier this year.
There are two clipless versions, with the option to choose between Boa dials or laces, and a single lace-up flat-pedal shoe.
The Union Flat costs £129.99/$149.95/€149.99 and has hex-shaped lugs to add pedal grip, according to Fox. The welded construction of the upper is said to add some light water resistance.
The Union, meanwhile, has a cleat cut-out and gains a Velcro strap on the upper. This shoe comes in at £159.99/$179.95/€169.99.
Finally, the Fox Union Boa ditches the laces and gains two Boa dials for closure.
Like the other two shoes, there’s a moulded toe cap and reinforced toe box, to protect against rock strikes.
The Union Boa costs £219.99/€239.99/$249.95.
]]>Scott claims its new Plasma RC TT is “the fastest bike” it has ever made, beating its predecessor by 33 seconds over 40km at the same power output.
The Plasma RC TT produces less drag at 55km/h through greater integration, while improving stability at speed, according to Scott.
The Swiss brand says the time trial bike’s Syncros Creston iC TT system is the world’s most adjustable integrated time trial cockpit.
The official launch comes almost a year after we first spotted a new Scott time trial bike at the 2022 Giro d’Italia.
The Scott Plasma RC TT is available as a frameset and cockpit-only in sizes small (49cm), medium (54cm) and large (58cm) for €7,999.
It’s compatible with hydraulic disc brakes and electronic groupsets, and has maximum tyre clearance of 30mm, according to Scott.
Scott says it used Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with help from aero experts Drag2Zero to identify the most efficient tube shapes.
It then conducted wind tunnel testing on a modular version of the bike. Scott says its testing revealed a shorter seat tube produced a two-watt efficiency saving when a rider was on the bike, despite a longer seat tube being more aerodynamic without a rider.
The finished product is typical of modern time trial bikes, such as the Pinarello Bolide, although it also bears a strong resemblance to the brand’s latest aero road bike, the Scott Foil RC.
Deep truncated aerofoil tubes are paired with dropped seatstays and an aero seatpost. However, the narrowness of the Scott Plasma RC TT’s head tube stands out (more on this later).
Besides being more aerodynamic, the brand claims the new Plasma RC TT frameset is 12 per cent lighter than the previous version.
Scott claims the Plasma RC TT is 33 seconds quicker over a 40km time trial compared to the previous version, when ridden at an identical power output.
Scott says that figure was calculated using real-world testing, rather than just race simulations.
Scott says it shortened the RC Plasma TT’s fork offset and increased the trail by 5.2mm in order to slow the steering and make the bike more stable at speed.
Although this geometry change doesn’t deliver immediate benefit in the wind tunnel, Scott claims a rider can stay in their most aerodynamic position for longer on a more stable bike.
As we noticed last year, the Scott Plasma RC TT has a very slim head tube.
The brand says its patented slotted headset design allows cables to run directly through the headset.
This removes the need for clearance for the cables to pass around the steerer and allows the use of a smaller upper bearing, according to Scott.
Therefore, the head tube can be narrower than previously possible, which Scott claims reduces drag as it lowers the bike’s frontal area.
The brand says this design also makes it easier to dismantle the fork and cockpit, for example when flying with your bike, because the cables do not need to be disconnected.
Scott says it analysed bike fit measurements from the Team DSM men’s, women’s and junior teams to create “the most adjustable integrated time trial cockpit on the market”.
The Syncros Creston IC TT system has adjustable and interchangeable parts that enable riders to finely tune the width, height, length and angle.
According to Scott, this enables all riders to find their most aerodynamic, physiologically efficient and comfortable position within the latest UCI technical regulations.
For example, the stem comes in three different sizes (85, 105 and 125mm).
The stack height of the armrests can be raised by up to 145mm to suit different degrees of hip flexibility and a rider’s individual time trial positions.
The vertical angle of the extensions can be adjusted from horizontal up to 15 degrees, while the grip angle is adjustable from 13 to 53 degrees to find the perfect hand position.
The position of the arm pads can also be adjusted for comfort. The extensions can be lengthened or shortened by up to 30mm to allow for different arm lengths.
The extensions can be adjusted laterally by up to five degrees to change hand spacing.
Scott says Romain Bardet, the Team DSM GC contender, has been riding the Scott Plasma RC TT with a Shimano Dura-Ace Di2 R9200 groupset and finishing kit from Scott’s house brand Syncros.
Frame: Scott Plasma RC TT
Rear derailleur: Shimano Dura-Ace RD-R9250
Front derailleur: Shimano Dura-Ace FD-9250 Di2
Shifters: Shimano Dura-Ace ST-R9180
Remote shifter: Shimano Dura-Ace SW-R9160
Brakes: Shimano Dura-Ace BR-R9270 hydraulic disc
Rotors: Shimano RT-MT900 140mm
Crankset: Shimano Dura-Ace FC-R9200 Power meter Hollowtech 54/40T
Cassette: Shimano Dura-Ave CS-R9200 11-30t
Chain: Shimano Dura-Ace CN-M9100 12-speed
Handlebar: Syncros Creston iC TT
Pedals: Shimano Dura-Ace PD9100
Seatpost: Syncros Duncan SL Aero 15mm
Head unit: Wahoo Elemnt Bolt
Saddle: Syncros Belcarra V Tri Firm
Tyres: Vittoria Corsa Speed 700x25c
]]>HIIT (high-intensity interval training) has swept the fitness world in recent years and the workouts are now a staple of gym classes and indoor training routines.
HIIT workouts are recognised as a way of burning a lot of calories in a short amount of time, so it’s easy to see why they are a favourite of time-poor gym-goers looking to squeeze the most out of their indoor training.
But HIIT needn’t be limited to weight-based activities and gym sessions, the benefits can be felt by time-crunched cyclists, too.
Here’s everything you need to know about high-intensity interval training, the benefits and how you can include HIIT in your training plan.
A HIIT workout intersperses short intervals of exercise at an effort level close to maximum with periods of recovery. In terms of your training zones, you’re looking at zones 5 to 6 for the effort and zone 1 in between.
When applied to cycling, there is no one set way to perform a HIIT workout, with different sessions offering different benefits.
“The duration of efforts could be from a couple of seconds up to a minute or more,” explains Matt Rowe of Rowe & King Cycle Coaching. “There’s no real hard or fast definition of it, other than you’ve got to be cycling hard and with great intensity on and off.
“You can make it as structured or unstructured as you like. Fartlek training is seemingly random efforts, and that’s a form of HIIT training.”
One of the biggest benefits of a HIIT workout is the short amount of time it takes to complete a session.
“It allows you to accumulate a lot of high-quality work at that top end of your fitness and really maximises the bang for your buck from any training session,” says Dr David Nichols, cycle training consultant for Wattbike.
Most sessions can be done in an hour or less and are easy to do on the turbo trainer, so you can squeeze a ride in with long-lasting benefits from the comfort of your own home.
“If you’re time-poor, you’ve got to be smart with what you do have,” says Matt Bottrill of Matt Bottrill Performance Coaching.
It’s possible to see a tangible training benefit from a session as short as 30 or 40 minutes, according to Bottrill, but he warns against over-reliance on HIIT workouts. “You can’t do it every day,” he says. “It’s not feasibly possible because you can’t hit that high intensity.”
The intensity of HIIT workouts can also help you to target the top-end training that might otherwise be missing from your rides, complementing your base training or sweetspot intervals.
“When you go out cycling, most people ride steady and they think they’re going quite hard,” says Rowe. “But you’re not really engaging your fast-twitch muscle fibres that much.
“The fast-twitch fibres can make all the difference in cycling. If you need to get up a climb and use a big surge in effort, that’s your fast-twitch fibres that you’re relying on. HIIT training does that perfectly.”
Because HIIT intervals are short, they enable you to accumulate a lot of time at an intensity above what you’d otherwise be able to sustain in continuous blocks. That, in turn, helps improve your VO2 max and threshold power, according to Nichols.
While high-intensity interval training is time-efficient and provides plenty of bang for your buck, it isn’t a miracle session that can simply replace all of the other workouts in your training plan.
Due to the nature of HIIT workouts, you need to be able to train at extremely high intensities during each session, and therefore need to recover properly between workouts.
“There’s no point in doing a top-end training session if you go into it so fatigued that you can’t reach the top end – you just end up training in that middle ground,” explains Nichols.
“By incorporating HIIT, you’ve got to be a bit smarter – are you going to have a rest day before it? What is your training session going to look like after that? You can’t just keep periodically smashing yourself.”
Nichols recommends two HIIT sessions a week – and a maximum of three – otherwise you risk overtraining. “You can have too much of a good thing,” he adds.
If you do decide to add HIIT workouts to your training, Rowe says it’s important to not neglect the rest of your riding. “If you purely do HIIT training, you’re going to struggle with your endurance because it’s all about short, sharp efforts,” he says.
Bottrill agrees, adding that you still need to be logging the miles to see the true benefits of HIIT workouts translated on the road. “You’ve still got to do that endurance base,” he says.
He also recommends keeping HIIT to a limited phase of a training block when you want to sharpen your fitness, because of how mentally challenging sessions can be. “The hardest bit is your head,” he says.
“The sessions take a lot out of you. You can find it very hard to then complete the next session. If you’re going to do that type of training, you’d probably want to build a six-week phase of it. Any more and you can’t go as deep mentally.”
While HIIT training can be done both indoors or outdoors, all the coaches we spoke to leaned towards an indoor setting on a turbo trainer or smart bike.
“I personally prefer to do it indoors,” says Wattbike’s Nichols. “It’s convenient, set up ready to go and there’s no time-wasting. Doing it outdoors can negate the time effectiveness of HIIT.”
As well as FTP and ramp tests, the latest indoor cycling apps offer structured workouts and training plans, many of which include HIIT-style interval sessions. The best smart trainers can control the resistance for each interval, ensuring you hit the numbers required to get fit fast.
If you do opt to train outside, Bottrill recommends planning a circuit that is either flat or uphill.
“You don’t want it to be too undulating and you want to control the environment,” he says. “That’s where a hill comes good – you can ascend a climb that’s three to four minutes and then recover on the descent.”
Rowe adds that it’s also possible to turn your commute into a HIIT workout, albeit an unstructured fartlek-style session: “Maybe as part of your commute, you could sprint to a signpost and do seemingly random efforts like that.”
Of course, as with any high-intensity ride outside, make sure you are paying full attention to your surroundings at all times.
As we’ve already covered, it’s possible to have too much of a good thing with high-intensity interval training, so it’s recommended to stick to a maximum of two to three sessions per week interspersed with longer endurance rides to really see the benefits.
However, for riders who can only squeeze in a short session around other commitments, Rowe would always recommend a HIIT workout.
“A well-rounded training plan touches on all different attributes,” he says. “Sweetspot sessions are great, but at least once a week you should be doing some top-end work. The frequency at which you do it is very personal, but in the winter you have to do whatever you can in the amount of time you’ve got.
“If you’ve only got 40 minutes to train, in that 40 minutes you might as well ride hard, so HIIT works for that.”
The fatigue-inducing nature of HIIT workouts makes it advisable to plan your sessions in advance to avoid overtraining. Nichols recommends scheduling your HIIT sessions around easy or rest days, and using a weekend ride to work on your endurance.
“A ride at the weekend is going to be your long endurance ride, maybe a club run or group ride,” he says. “Outside of that, you can do two midweek interval sessions. These are your absolute high-effort, high-intensity training sessions.
“If that’s Tuesday and Thursday, you’re going to have Monday and Wednesday easy because you’ve got to schedule that recovery in.”
Each ‘on’ interval should be in zone five if you train with a power meter. Rowe recommends doing 1, 1.5 or 2 pyramids, depending on how much time you have.
10-minute warm-up
10 seconds on (zone 5)
50 seconds off (zone 1)
20 seconds on (zone 5)
40 seconds off (zone 1)
30 seconds on (zone 5)
30 seconds off (zone 1)
40 seconds on (zone 5)
20 seconds off (zone 1)
50 seconds on (zone 5)
10 seconds off (zone 1)
60 seconds on (zone 5)
60 seconds off (zone 1)
50 seconds on (zone 5)
10 seconds off (zone 1)
40 seconds on (zone 5)
20 seconds off (zone 1)
30 seconds on (zone 5)
30 seconds off (zone 1)
20 seconds on (zone 5)
40 seconds off (zone 1)
10 seconds on (zone 5)
50 seconds off (zone 1)
5-minute cool down
While the intervals here are longer than a typical HIIT session, Nichols describes this workout as “an absolute classic that all WorldTour riders are doing”. If you want to increase the difficulty further, he recommends ‘pre-loading’ the VO2 intervals.
“Rather than doing a consistent five-minute interval at VO2 max, you could start the first minute exceptionally hard – harder than you want to be going,” he says.
“Digging really deep at the start and almost hanging on is a really great way of getting you up to VO2 max quicker.”
10-minute warm-up
5 minutes at VO2 max power (110–120% of FTP)
5-minute recovery (zone one, total recovery)
(repeat five times)
5-minute cool down
Wahoo has updated Summit Freeride so the navigation feature automatically warns you of approaching climbs and displays relevant data as you ascend.
Previously, the climb detection and preview functionality worked on Wahoo Elemnt bike computers when users were following a pre-loaded route. Now it’ll work on any ride, regardless of whether you are following a route.
The software update brings Wahoo’s climbing tool up to speed with many of the best bike computers.
Hammerhead’s Climber feature was the first to preview hills without needing a route, launching on the Karoo 2 in 2022.
More recently, Garmin introduced on-the-fly climb detection via ClimbPro 2.0 on its new Edge 540 and 840 computers.
Wahoo says Summit Freeride harnesses the pre-installed map and elevation data on its Elemnt Bolt and Elemnt Roam computers. It scans the road ahead to anticipate and notify the rider of upcoming climbs.
Once a climb is detected, Summit Freeride adds it to the device’s upcoming climb list. On the map page, chevrons will indicate the climb’s position and steepness.
During ascents, the software displays the remaining elevation, gradient, time, and distance to the summit.
The climb profile is broken down into coloured-coded, 10m sections with darker shades indicating steeper gradients. Wahoo says this should help users to better pace their climbing efforts.
The fitness brand claims that Summit Freeride will recalculate if a rider turns off a climb, onto a different road, and continues ascending.
Wahoo says Summit Freeride’s minimum criteria for a climb is 400m long at an average gradient of three per cent, or 250m long with an average incline of seven per cent.
Users can configure the categories of climbs they want to see in the Elemnt app.
It is also possible to sort climbs by difficulty during a ride. Wahoo claims this will help riders hold back something for tough hills to come.
The incoming climb alert will come up even when riders are locked into another data screen, such as the workout or map screen, according to the brand.
Summit Freeride is available to use now on the latest versions of the Elemnt Roam and Elemnt Bolt.
]]>EF Education-EasyPost will switch to a 72 per cent recycled Rapha kit for the Giro d’Italia, adding yellow to the team’s already colourful wardrobe.
The new EF Giro Switch-Out kit is much less pink than the strip the WorldTour team has ridden in the 2023 season.
This is to avoid clashing with the Maglia Rosa – the general classification leader’s jersey at the Giro d’Italia.
It follows previous switch-out kits used by the team at the race, including 2021’s Euphoria kit and the duck-themed collaboration with Palace skateboards.
Rapha has swapped the lighter shade of pink on the front for yellow, and tinted the sleeves lime and dark green.
The top half of the back is also yellow and sits above an orange strip with two recycling logos.
The bib shorts use the same dark green as the jersey and two different shades of blue.
The replica version of the EF Giro Switch-Out kit is made entirely from leftover materials, according to Rapha.
Called Rapha Excess, the collection mirrors and adds to the colourways of the team-issue kit to maximise the amount of fabric it repurposes.
The brand says the EF Giro Switch-Out kit contains a smaller proportion of recycled material because UCI rules mandate that all team kit looks and is the same.
The Excess Collection forms part of Rapha’s plan to reduce the environmental impact of cycling.
It claims to have saved 2,303m of surplus fabric and 24kg of yarn, while trying to reuse zips, elastic and size labels where possible.
The team bike, the Lab71 version of the Cannondale SuperSix Evo Hi-Mod, appears to have a fresh paintjob too.
The mottled pattern on the down tube combines the colours of the jersey and bib shorts.
EF Education-Tibco-SVB will also wear the new kit at the Giro Donne in June.
It’s not only Rapha that has released custom kit for the 2023 Giro d’Italia.
To celebrate the 106th edition of the Corsa Rosa, Colnago has released a limited-edition Gioiello bike, based on the C68 frame and adorned with gold leaf.
The Italian brand says the 50 units of the Gioiello, which means jewel, will be individually numbered. The bikes will be available to buy for €22,000 from 8 May.
The design of the 3D-printed bottle cage replicates the spirals of the Trofeo Senza Fine, the Giro d’Italia overall winner’s trophy, and is coated with gold leaf, according to Colnago.
The bike’s CeramicSpeed OSPW derailleur cage is printed in 3D titanium and TiN-coated.
The Ace of Clubs Colnago logo decorates the textured fork, saddle and handlebar tape. The symbol is also printed on the spokes of a gold-coloured version of the ENVE SES 3.4 wheelset wrapped in custom Pirelli P Zero Race TLR tyres.
Frame: Colnago C68 Road
Handlebar and stem: Colnago CC.01 integrated, carbon
Groupset: Shimano Dura-Ace Di2 R9250
Pulley wheel: CeramicSpeed OSPW 3D Printed Ti OSPW TiN Coated
Saddle: Selle Italia SLR flow carbon
Wheels: Enve SES 3.4 Gold version
Tyres: Pirelli P Zero Race TLR Gold x Colnago for Giro d’Italia
Handlebar tape: Colnago for Giro d’Italia
Bottle cage: Colnago for Giro d’Italia
]]>Fulcrum has announced new Fulcrum Speed 42 and 57 wheels, claiming the wider and deeper rims handle better than the models they replace.
The new Speed disc-brake only wheels replace the previous 40mm and 55mm sizes. The 42mm-deep wheelset weighs a claimed 1,410g, while the 57mm version is said to weigh 1,495g.
They use much of the same technology as the shallower Fulcrum Speed 25 wheelset.
The Fulcrum Speed 42 is available to buy now for £1,999/$2,692/€2,265. The Fulcrum Speed 57 is coming in June and will cost the same, positioning both wheelsets at the top of the brand’s price range.
When riding into a headwind, the brand says the new 23mm internal rim width is 10 per cent more aerodynamic than the previous 19mm rim width.
Fulcrum claims the Speed 42 and 57 wheels handle up to 17 per cent better than before, despite being deeper.
The brand says it calculated this figure using a formula that takes into account how much energy the wheel dissipates when changing direction and flexing.
The brand claims the hole-less rim channel enables any tubeless road bike tyre to be fitted without rim tape, while maintaining even stiffness and increasing strength.
The polished internal finish of the rim is said to facilitate the mounting and seating of the tyre.
Because the rim is hooked, it also works with clincher road bike tyres.
However, on the Speed wheels a 700x28mm tyre set up tubeless optimises rolling resistance, comfort and aerodynamics, according to Fulcrum.
The nipple holes are formed in the wheel mould rather than by drilling through the rim. The latter approach weakens the structure, says the Italian brand.
The Fulcrum Speed 42 and 57 wheels are made from a new composite mix of FF100 high-modulus unidirectional fibres. The brand says this “perfect mix of fibres” improves on the ride quality of the outgoing wheels.
Fulcrum says its Directional Rim-Spoke Coupling system sinks a plastic support between the nipples and rim. This is claimed to improve stiffness and durability by spreading stress of the nipples more evenly, while also reducing the risk of corrosion.
Fulcrum has laced 24 aerodynamic and straight-pull spokes to the Speed 42 and 57 wheels in its Two-to-One system.
This doubles the number of spokes in the area under greater mechanical stress in order to minimise energy dispersion and counteract torsional force, according to the brand.
As a result, the front wheel has 16 spokes on the brake side and eight on the other. The rear wheel has 16 spokes on the driveside and eight spokes on the non-driveside.
Fulcrum claims this spoke-lacing method has made power transfer 10 per cent more efficient than on the previous Speed wheels.
The brand says the redesigned hubs hold a lighter and more precise freewheel mechanism than before.
Fulcrum says the flanges are 40 per cent smaller and the central body has reduced in size by 10 per cent. This is claimed to lower aerodynamic drag, while maintaining stiffness.
The ceramic cup and cone bearings in the Speed 42 and 57 provide “unparalleled levels of smoothness”, according to Fulcrum.
The freewheel ratchet system has increased in size to 36 teeth, which translates into a 10-degree engagement angle. This is comparable to other performance road bike wheelsets.
The wheelsets are available with Campagnolo, SRAM and Shimano freehub bodies.
]]>Pirelli has launched its new P Zero Race TLR 4S, a tubeless racing tyre designed to be used all-year-round.
The tyre bridges the gap between the tougher Cinturato Velo and faster P Zero Race TLR tyres, and is now tubeless-ready.
The existing P Zero Race 4S tyre, which we highly rated in our review last year, was one of Pirelli’s only road bike tyres to not be available in a tubeless format. The tyre will remain in the range as a clincher option.
The brand claims the new tyre offers consistent grip in all weathers and has been optimised for cold and wet days.
Produced in the brand’s new Milano-Bollate facility, the P Zero Race TLR 4S is constructed from the brand’s SMARTNET Silica compound with a 120 TPI nylon casing. This compound is also found on the Cinturato Velo, albeit with a less supple 60 TPI casing.
Pirelli claims the compound performs particularly well on wet or cold surfaces in cooler temperatures.
The P Zero Race TLR 4S also uses Pirelli’s SpeedCore technology, which debuted on the P Zero Race TLR. According to Pirelli, this compound uses aramid fibres to provide improved puncture protection and lower rolling resistance, as well as offer a more comfortable ride.
Pirelli says the tyres are compatible with hookless rims, as long as you do not exceed the ETRTO-recommended 73psi maximum pressure limit.
The P Zero Race TLR 4S is available for 700c wheels in 28, 30 and 32mm widths. It’s claimed to weigh 330g, 365g and 395g respectively for the three widths.
The tyres will only be available in black, with no mention of a ‘Classic’ (tanwall) option on release.
The tyres will retail for £78.99 for the 28mm variant, £79.99 for the 30mm tyre and £80.99 for the 32mm. International pricing is to be confirmed.
]]>The key to choosing the best commuter bike is ensuring it’s comfortable and practical for the type of riding you intend to do.
If your commute is short and you’re not in a rush, your best bike for commuting could be a flat-bar bike, such as a hybrid or mountain bike.
Or, if you want to cover lots of ground quickly, a drop-bar road or gravel bike may be a better choice for you.
In this in-depth guide, we’ll talk you through the options and recommend bikes in each category that have earned the approval of our expert reviewers.
You’re unlikely to commit to regularly commuting to work by bike in all weather conditions if it’s a chore in the first place, so we’ve put together this handy guide to help you choose the best commuter bike for you.
What type of bike you choose to ride to work will depend on factors such as journey distance, terrain, where you live and your taste in bikes.
To help make your decision easier, we’ve explained how common types of bike fare on the daily commute.
It’s also worth mentioning that most bikes can be made into great commuters, with the addition of full-length mudguards for foul weather, luggage-carrying capability and a set of the best bike lights for year-round visibility. With these affordable modifications, your languishing older bike may be a prime candidate for resurrection as a commuter.
If you have a particular type of bike in mind for your daily commuter, you can use the jump links below to skip to the relevant section of this article:
A hybrid bike is best thought of as a hardy road bike that takes some influence from mountain bikes. It borrows its off-road cousin’s flat handlebars and a more upright, traffic- and comfort-friendly position.
Like a road bike, modern hybrids are usually built around 700c wheels. However, the tyres are often wider than a road bike’s – but usually not as wide as a mountain bike – enabling you to traverse rough roads and gravel paths comfortably, especially with the best gravel bike tyres.
Most hybrids have a rigid fork, but some are also sold with cheaper suspension forks. While the idea of suspension may seem appealing, be wary, because most models have heavy low-end forks that add little to the comfort of the bike.
Cheaper hybrids usually have rim brakes, while the best hybrid bikes are equipped with disc brakes.
Disc brakes offer more powerful, predictable and reliable braking – even in the rain – than rim brakes. They are definitely something you should look out for.
Hybrid bikes are also hugely versatile, with many bikes ready to go with bosses and mounts for every accessory imaginable. This makes them ideal for conversion to other duties, such as touring.
It’s also worth looking out for hybrids with accessories. Adding on mudguards, a rack and lights is expensive, so these packages often present good value for money.
Whether you’re a beginner looking for a general-use bike or are a dedicated commuter who prefers an upright position in traffic, a flat-bar hybrid is a great choice for you.
This is a small selection of the best hybrid bikes for commuting. Head to our full list of the best hybrid bikes for more.
Besides being a joy to pedal, the Canyon Commuter 7 comes with commuting accessories, such as dynamo lighting, a rack and mudguards. The Gates belt drive shifts well and cuts down on drivechain maintenance.
The Ribble Hybrid AL is a robust, comfortable bike that can take the rigours of commuting. Fitted with wide tyres on 650b rims, it will soak up a lot of road imperfections and, using the Ribble bike builder, you can choose from a wide range of specs and extras including mudguards and a rear rack.
The Cannondale Treadwell EQ has a front rack (which can carry up to 10kg), panniers and rack mounts for extra luggage. Its mudguards are fairly protective, its brakes are good and its gearing is suitable for town riding.
As technology has matured and their adoption has become widespread, there’s no denying that electric bikes have become an increasingly dominant force in the cycling market and electric bikes for commuting are a great option.
While the proponents and haters of ebikes will debate whether or not they have a place in the cycling world, we at BikeRadar are big fans of them.
Not only do they open up cycling to a broader audience, but the best electric bikes also enable more experienced cyclists to cover far greater distances.
And this ability to cover ground easily comes into its own with an electric commuter bike.
Electric bikes can improve your fitness. Plus, they enable those who live out of town to ride long distances to work, even with a heavy load.
One of the misconceptions about electric bikes is that they do all the work for you, which is not the case. With the helping hand an electric bike motor affords, ‘assist‘ is the key word here.
You still have to pedal on an ebike and will invariably tire yourself out riding one, you’ll just do it over a far greater distance than on a regular bike.
Of course, there’s a weight and price penalty to pay with an ebike, but the technology that powers them is becoming more accessible.
While we don’t want to speculate too much, we foresee modern, ultra-reliable ebikes becoming a truly viable car alternative in years to come.
With that in mind, for those who live a distance from work, it’s definitely worth considering whether ditching the car (and the cost of running one) and investing in an electric bike for commuting is a viable option.
This is a small selection of the best electric bikes for commuting. Head to our full list of the best electric hybrid bikes for more.
The Specialized Turbo Vado 4.0 is well specced for commuting, with lights, mudguards, a rack and a kickstand. There’s also a suspension fork and seatpost to add comfort. Range is good and the powerful motor adds plenty of assistance, although at 25kg it’s heavy to move around when you’re not riding.
If you need to carry a larger load on your commute, an electric cargo bike could be the answer. The motor really helps keep you moving and, in the case of the Tern Quick Haul, you can load up with up to 70kg of cargo. It stands on its rack for more compact storage too.
Canyon has given the Precede:ON sleek looks with a high-capacity integrated battery and a belt drive to reduce maintenance and cleaning. Continuously variable transmission makes gear shifts a thing of the past. The motor gives plenty of assistance and the bike feels stable but agile, despite its 23kg weight.
Most often built around diminutive 16in or 20in wheels, folding bikes, as the name suggests, fold down into impressively small packages that can be stored neatly at either end of your journey.
The best folding bikes are also ideal for those who don’t intend to ride the entire way to work, completing part of the journey by public transport – or, if you prefer, go ‘multimodal’.
Due to their small wheels and the inevitable compromise that creating a packable bike demands, folding bikes won’t handle like a regular bike.
They also tend to feel pretty sluggish on the road, but how likely is it that you’ll be regularly razzing around the streets at full gas during rush hour on a folding bike anyway?
The next option is a folding electric commuter bike. The extra boost provided by the motor helps to compensate for a pedal-only folding bike’s slowish ride, even though the best folding electric bikes will weigh more than a pedal-only folding bike.
While some folding bikes are built around larger wheels, they don’t fold down nearly as compactly as their small-wheeled brethren, and some trains and buses won’t accept them. This only really makes these bikes useful when space is tight at home or work.
The undoubted market leader here is Brompton, with a clever design that has become something of a modern classic.
The British company’s newest model, the Brompton P Line, is the lightest yet and there’s even the Brompton Electric if you want some assistance.
However, there are lots of interesting options from other manufacturers too, such as Tern.
If convenience, easy storage and the ability to travel on public transport trump all, a folder is likely the right choice for you.
This is a small selection of the best folding bikes. Head to our full list of the best folding bikes for more.
Despite weighing a willowy 10kg, the speedy Brompton P Line remains practical. It has a front carrier rack and folds up easily.
The MiRider ONE is a compact electric folder that offers up to 45 miles on a charge. The ride is nippy and the wide tyres help cushion the road well. It’s also quick to fold and its 17.2kg weight isn’t excessive for an electric folding bike. It’s available as a singlespeed or a geared bike.
The GoCycle G4 handles better than many folding bikes, both on- and off-road thanks to wide tyres, 20in wheels and suspension. Its motor has plenty of power and it’s quick to fold into a wheelable package or further for compact storage.
Built for use on tarmac, the best road bikes are for riding long distances fast and can make some of the best commuter bikes.
However, a road bike subjected to the ravages of potholes, poor weather and rough terrain will inevitably deteriorate quicker than a hardier bike. But given appropriate care and regular maintenance, it will, of course, last for years.
You’re unlikely to want to spend a fortune on a road bike dedicated to commuting, and even bikes as cheap as £600 can make great commuter bikes. Just make sure your choice has mudguard eyelets, a dependable groupset and a strong, high-spoke-count wheelset.
While carbon will offer the lightest and stiffest ride possible, value for money (which a cheaper alloy or steel bike may offer) and longevity should be your primary concerns.
If you do decide to go for a carbon bike, greater care should also be taken when locking it up.
On the subject of locks, it’s worth noting that thieves really do love a road bike, so it’s wise to invest in one of the best bike locks and bicycle insurance, just in case.
If you opt for a particularly bulky lock, you can always leave it attached to your bike rack at work.
Finally, most road bikes will come with lightweight and fast-rolling tyres. While these feel great on a fast Sunday ride, the best road bike tyres are likely to be far more puncture-prone than a sturdier tyre, and you’ll want to swap them out for the best winter road bike tyres for commuting.
This is a small selection of the best endurance road bikes. Head to our full list of the best endurance road bikes and the best cheap road bikes for more.
The Fairlight Strael’s steel frame should serve you well and is available in regular and tall sizes. It can handle wide tyres as well as mudguards, making it a great four seasons road bike, while the frame is comfortable and smooth-riding.
Decathlon’s Triban RC120 provides phenomenal value for money if you’re looking for a durable commuter road bike. There’s plenty of gear range and decent rim brakes, and you can fit a rack and mudguards for all-weather commuting duties.
Boardman is another brand that provides impressive value, and the SLR 8.6 is comfortable and fitted with an 8-speed Shimano Claris groupset for crisp shifting. It’s another bike you can kit out with mudguards and a rack as well.
A gravel, adventure, cyclocross, #groad, or whatever else you want to call it bike, is best thought of as a road bike with changes that also make it suitable for use off-road.
Primarily, on the best gravel bikes, clearances are improved so that chunkier gravel tyres can be fitted, smoothing out the ride on broken surfaces.
The wheelbase of a gravel bike is often considerably longer than a road bike, with the head angle often slackened to ease handling over rougher terrain, plus disc brakes for good stopping power.
Gravel bikes are designed to be versatile, with most having provisions to mount mudguards, racks and multiple bottle cages.
Combined with a road-like fit, these bikes make excellent commuter bikes for those who have to contend with poor roads or light off-road detours.
Dedicated cyclocross bikes tend to lack these commuter-friendly provisions and usually feature a more aggressive fit than their all-road-minded cousins. But, with some modifications, many still make great commuter bikes.
This is a small selection of the best gravel bikes. Head to our full list of the best gravel bikes and best budget gravel bikes for more.
The Marin Nicasio + has a bombproof steel frame and fork. It’s specced with an impressive Microshift single ring groupset and wide, comfortable tyres. It may be on the heavy side, but it can handle anything that the trails (or city roads) can throw at it.
The Boardman ADV 8.6 provides versatility, with a Shimano Sora groupset and rack and mudguard mounts. The 38mm tyres are tubeless-ready, so you can reduce the risk of punctures on your commute, while the quality touchpoints offer a comfortable ride.
Voodoo offers you a quality spec for a budget price, with the same 9-speed Sora groupset as the Boardman. The Nakisi provides low gearing and quality WTB Riddler tyres. It’s another bike that can take a rack and mudguards if needed.
The upright riding position and sturdy nature of the best mountain bikes have long made them a popular choice with commuters.
While a mountain bike’s knobbly tyres are great if your commute follows an off-road route, they will add a considerable amount of drag when riding in town.
If you plan to use a mountain bike just for commuting, we’d recommend fitting slick tyres to unleash the bike’s full potential.
We’d also recommend steering clear of full-suspension or trail mountain bikes, because you’ll be paying for a load of technology you’ll never really use.
Instead, look for a cross-country bike, even one that’s fully rigid. As with everything else, ensure it has all the mounts you need to make the bike more commuting friendly.
This is a small selection of the best mountain bikes. Head to our full list of the best mountain bikes, the best mountain bikes for around £500 and the best mountain bikes under £750 for more.
Another great-value option available at Halfords, the Carrera Fury includes both a dropper post and hydraulic brakes. It’s comfortable both when climbing and descending, and corners well too, with plenty of grip.
The Marin Bobcat Trail 3 can handle a wide range of off-road conditions and comes with smaller wheels on smaller-sized bikes for consistent handling across the size range. The spec and geometry are geared towards distance rather than aggressive riding.
The Voodoo Bizango has a fine-looking carbon frame and excellent spec for the money. It’s an admirable cross-country performer that will do much more.
The Pro’s Closet is an online retailer that offers a constantly changing selection of Certified Pre-Owned and new bikes, wheels and parts.
All second-hand products sold by The Pro’s Closet are inspected meticulously – and, if required, repaired – prior to sale, giving you the same confidence you have when buying new, and at a lower price.
Alongside the used bikes and equipment, there’s also a range of new cycling kit, components and accessories on offer.
Based in Colorado, The Pro’s Closet ships across the United States of America and Canada.
Each bike undergoes a 141-point inspection by The Pro’s Closet’s team of mechanics.
In fact, no fewer than eight mechanics work on each bike through the different phases of inspection and tuning.
From a deep clean to servicing the drivetrain, brakes and wheels – including any necessary part replacements or repairs – The Pro’s Closet estimates the average value of this service at over $200.
Each bike listed on The Pro’s Closet site includes photos outlining any repairs and imperfections, offering complete clarity when you’re considering the bike.
The Pro’s Closet even has an indoor track on its warehouse floor, where bikes are test-ridden to ensure they’re ready to ride when they arrive at your door.
Each bike sold under the Certified Pre-Owned programme comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
If your bike doesn’t meet your expectations or the fit isn’t right, you can return it and get your money back.
Certified Pre-Owned bikes also come with a guaranteed buy-back offer for 18 months.
If you fancy trying something new, or like to upgrade regularly, you can do so with less cash coming out of your pocket.
All bikes from The Pro’s Closet, whether new or part of its Certified Pre-Owned scheme, are shipped almost fully assembled. That means there’s very little standing in the way of your first ride on new bike day.
In addition to the bike itself, The Pro’s Closet supplies a torque tool, tutorial and guide to help you get started.
The Pro’s Closet carries a wide selection of Certified Pre-Owned and new bikes from brands including Specialized, Giant and Forbidden, as well as new bikes from Orbea, Rocky Mountain and Bombtrack.
There’s also an extensive catalogue of frames, parts, accessories and kit for road cycling, mountain biking, gravel riding and commuting.
The Pro’s Closet has even opened a retail store at its Louisville, Colorado headquarters so cyclists can see bikes in person and gear up for their next ride.
Here’s a selection of what’s currently on offer:
Among the few carbon fibre frame manufacturers in the US, Allied’s bikes are highly desirable. At almost half retail price for this cherry of a build, it’s a bargain waiting to be snapped up.
Fancy some XC adventures this summer? This Yeti Cycles Arc Turq C1 could be just the rig for you.
If you thought The Pro’s Closet was just for mainstream bikes, think again! This handmade steel Vanilla Workshop Speedvagen with an integrated seatpost is a perfect example.
]]>Launched in September 2022, Lapierre’s Prorace CF 9.9 cross-country hardtail has arrived at BikeRadar Towers for testing.
This hardtail mountain bike has 100mm of suspension travel and is easily identifiable by its triple-triangle style design, which Lapierre claims introduces further compliance.
Let’s take a closer look at this race-ready build.
The Prorace sees a significant reduction in weight over its predecessor, thanks to the brand’s new UD SLI (Unidirectional Superlight Innovation) carbon construction. This first debuted on the brand’s XR and XRM full-suspension cross-country mountain bikes launched in March 2022.
There are two tiers of carbon frame, with this frame using the lighter ‘UD SLI Team’ carbon layup. Lapierre claims an 845g frame weight in a size medium, with the second-tier frames said to be 970g in an equivalent size.
Lapierre says it has used new unidirectional Torayca carbon fibres. The brand is remaining coy on what exactly is used, although it notes T1000 carbon fibre features mainly on the top-tier frames.
Lapierre also claims it has been able to expel excess resin from a new polypropylene rigid mandrel it has developed (what the fibres are wrapped around in the manufacturing process). The brand also says it has reduced the wall thickness of the tubes to save weight.
The hardtail inherits the 3D Tubular concept the brand has used on its road bikes since 2015, such as the Xelius SL 9.0.
What is effectively a triple-triangle design sees the seatstays separated from the seat tube, which Lapierre claims improves their flexibility and disperses vibrations and other shocks via the top tube.
The geometry has also been revised, heading down the longer, lower and slacker route. All sizes feature a 68-degree head tube angle and 74-degree seat tube angle, with the reach 455mm on a size large.
Every fortnight, we’ll bring you a detailed first look at one of the latest bikes (or framesets) to arrive at BikeRadar HQ – from road to commuting, gravel to enduro, and anything in between.
This is our chance to introduce the bike and everything that makes it unique before hitting the road or trails.
Head to our Bike of the Week hub for previous editions.
At £5,999/€6,799/AU$11,999, the Prorace CF 9.9 we have in for testing sits at the top of the range.
For carbon-framed models, the range starts at £1,999/€2,299/AU$4,299 for the Prorace CF 5.9 and there’s even an aluminium 4.9 model at £1,499/€1,499/AU$3,499.
RockShox is on suspension duty on the Prorace CF 9.9 with its SID SL Ultimate Charger Race Day fork.
The bike is decked out with a SRAM X01 Eagle AXS drivetrain, the only deviation being an X1 carbon crankset. Lapierre opts for a 34t chainring, with the crankset spinning on a PF92 bottom bracket.
SRAM’s Level TLM disc brakes bring you to a stop and Lapierre specs a 180mm SRAM Centerline rotor up-front and a smaller-diameter 160mm out back.
Lapierre provides its own XC CL 29 carbon mountain bike wheels with an asymmetric rim. The wheels feature a 27mm internal rim width and are wrapped with Maxxis’ Rekon Race mountain bike tyres in a 29×2.35in flavour. The Rekons feature Maxxis’ 3C MaxxTerra triple compound with a 120 TPI casing.
A 740mm-wide FSA SL-K carbon handlebar in 740mm width is paired with Lapierre’s own 7050 Alloy forged stem. The brand also provides its own lock-on grips and alloy 27.2mm-diameter seatpost, with a Fizik Taiga saddle.
Our size-large test bike weighs in at 9.79kg without pedals.
The Prorace is part of a cross-country bikes group test, so stay tuned for senior technical editor Tom Marvin’s verdict.
]]>Tom Pidcock and his Ineos Grenadiers team-mate, Pauline Ferrand-Prevot, are riding what appears to be a prototype Pinarello mountain bike wrapped in a camouflage paintjob.
Both riders were spotted riding the new cross-country bike at the Guéret round of the MTB French Cup.
Pidcock used it for both the XCC (short-track) and XCO races, while Ferrand-Prevot started her season in the women’s XCO event ahead of the opening UCI World Cup race of the season in Nové Město, Czech Republic, on 12-14 May.
Here’s what we know so far about Pidcock and Ferrand-Prevot’s new cross-country bike.
Pinarello is the bike sponsor of Ineos Grenadiers and hasn’t made a cross-country mountain bike since it launched the Dogma XC in 2012.
With no bike to ride contractually, Pidcock has chosen to ride an unbranded BMC Fourstroke for the past two seasons, including for his Tokyo 2021 Olympic win.
Pinarello presumably wasn’t too happy about this arrangement, with the production of this bike rumoured since last year.
The new cross-country bike will enable the brand to provide for all of Pidcock’s racing, giving the multi-faceted man every opportunity to win on a Pinarello frame.
The new bike has the rear shock positioned under the top tube, which is the current trend for cross-country bikes because it enables two bottle cages to be fitted inside the front triangle.
Brands such as Specialized have gone as far as developing a new ‘skinny’ shock alongside RockShox to sit within the top tube for the new Specialized Epic World Cup.
Pinarello doesn’t appear to have gone this far, instead using an external top tube mount with a skeletal construction for possible weight savings.
The bike uses a yoke-style rear linkage, and the lack of pivot bearings in the rear triangle suggests it relies on the flex stays to provide suspension travel.
This concept has been seen before on cross-country bikes, with Cannondale’s Scalpel providing 100mm of rear suspension.
It’s not known how much travel Pinarello’s system will provide, but the trend for longer-travel bikes on ever-more technical courses doesn’t seem to be going anywhere. Orbea’s new Oiz features 120mm of rear suspension.
A mysterious triangle section around the bottom bracket looks similar to the air tank for the automatic dropper post on BMC’s Fourstroke – though the bike is specced with a traditional dropper post.
The bike’s integrated handlebar is branded MOST, which is Pinarello’s in-house component label and appears to feature an integrated computer mount on the top of the stem portion.
While the front of Pidcock and Ferrand-Prevot’s bikes are largely obscured by race numbers, images from the rear of the bike show how the integrated cable routing feeds the cables/hydraulic hoses into the frame from the underside of the stem.
While integrated cable routing makes a bike look cleaner, it also reduces the chance of pulling a cable out when crashing or jostling for places. On the other hand, maintenance is more involved because you need to bleed the brakes every time you service or replace a headset bearing.
The integrated bars are yet to be released and do not feature on Pinarello’s website.
The bike appears to be using SR Suntour’s prototype electronically controlled suspension system for the suspension fork and rear shock. Pidcock has employed this since the Tokyo Olympics in 2021.
Little is known about the unreleased system, but it’s likely to be broadly similar to RockShox’s Flight Attendant, which actively adjusts the suspension’s settings to firm up the bike for pedalling efficiency and maximises the travel for extra grip on descents.
The fork looks to be an evolution of SR Suntour’s Axon cross-country fork, featuring a carbon crown, with the rear shock appearing to use SR Suntour Edge externals.
While we don’t know the travel of the fork, the existing SR Suntour Axon comes in 100mm, 110mm and 120mm travel options.
The new bike rolls on a pair of prototype 29in Princeton CarbonWorks wheels, wrapped in Continental RaceKing tyres.
Princeton CarbonWorks offers a range of road, gravel and disc wheels, used by Ineos Grenadiers since 2021, but this would be the US brand’s first mountain bike wheel.
The new wheelset features Princeton’s signature variable-depth rim profile that is claimed to reduce weight and add strength without sacrificing aero performance. It’s not known what the internal rim width of these wheels will be.
Pidcock has been running a tyre with a 2.2in width at the rear, though the frame looks able to handle the more aggressive 2.4in size now increasingly common on the latest XC bikes.
The new bike follows Pinarello’s new design language, with a sweeping top tube kink that is similar to the brand’s new comfort-oriented X-Series endurance bikes and Nytro e-road bike, launched in March.
Beyond aesthetics, we’re not sure what the design feature does on this bike, if anything – but regardless, it marks it out as a Pinarello.
Quite simply, we don’t know. We have asked Pinarello for comment and will update this article if we hear back.
However, with the World Cup season due to begin in May, and the next Olympic Games around the corner in 2024, a release this summer is likely.
]]>The best smart bikes are more effective and realistic than ever, with great power accuracy, adjustable positions and even features such as simulated gradients.
If you’re growing to love cycling in the great indoors, whether that’s to beat bad weather or make the most of limited time, a smart bike provides a dedicated training setup designed for the task in hand.
Unlike the turbo, a smart bike packages up everything you need to ride indoors in one bundle. You don’t need to worry about using your carbon fibre bike on the turbo trainer, nor do you need to be concerned about the increased wear and tear of expensive components.
On the flip side, smart bikes are a significant investment and require space for a dedicated indoor training space.
Here’s BikeRadar’s pick of the indoor bikes we’ve tested, plus our buyer’s guide on what to look for if you’re thinking about splashing out on a smart bike.
The second-generation Wahoo Kickr Bike provides an incredibly realistic ride, with plenty of adjustability, accuracy and reliability justifying the high price tag.
Wahoo has added WiFi connectivity to the latest Kickr Bike. Our tester experienced no connection dropouts during testing despite racking up hundreds of kilometres on Wahoo X.
The real-time gradient change function is a standout feature of this bike. Whether tilting forward or back, this is a smooth process that adds to the experience and edges virtual riding closer to reality.
Wahoo claims the bike’s power measurement is within 1 per cent accuracy. Our tester found its readings matched his heart rate and wattage data from using the Wattbike Atom.
The large flywheel and motor combine for a quiet ride, with only a gentle hum emanating from the static bike.
The only real downside to the Wahoo Kickr Bike is the wide top tube, which is broader than an outdoor bike and could cause issues if you have wider thighs.
The Stages Cycling SB20 is a smart bike from a brand best known for its power meters.
As you’d expect from an indoor bike, it’s much more expensive than a smart trainer – but, as an all-in-one package, it leaves your other bike free to ride outside.
The SB20’s saddle and cockpit can be micro-adjusted, allowing you to fine-tune the fit, and there are four crank-length options.
You can also choose your preferred shifting configuration (Shimano, SRAM, Campagnolo) and customise your drivetrain, thanks to the in-built shift buttons, but there’s no tactile feedback when making gear changes.
The SB20 can be connected to the most popular indoor training apps, including Zwift. The Stages Link app also allows you to save virtual bikes and monitor workout data.
This is a heavy piece of kit and arrives in a 100kg-plus box but, once you’ve completed the straightforward setup process, the SB20’s bulk keeps it firmly in place when putting in efforts.
Stages says the bike can register 2,200 watts. Although our tester couldn’t verify this, they couldn’t fault the in-built power meter’s accuracy. The bike also produces a smooth, fluid pedalling sensation and remains quiet during efforts.
The Wattbike Atom is easy to set up and get connected to your computer, tablet (for which there’s integrated support) or smartphone, as well as third-party indoor training apps, including Zwift. There are plenty of training routines available in the accompanying Wattbike app, too.
It’s easy to change saddle height, handlebar height and a number of bike fit adjustments, but crank length is fixed at 170mm. Although it’s heavy, you can roll the Atom around on its small front wheels.
With a chain drive for the resistance unit, there’s an outdoor bike feel to the Atom, although that does generate a bit more noise than its competitors. The drop handlebar at the front mimics the setup of a road bike but, with 22 sequential gears, set ratios and no brake levers, that’s where the comparison ends.
The Atom generates loads of data on power output, pedalling smoothness and other metrics, although when doing HIIT sessions, we found the lag when changing resistance sometimes made for awkward transitions.
The following indoor bike scored fewer than 4 out of 5 stars in our reviews but is still worth considering.
The step-through frame of the Tacx NEO Bike Smart makes getting on and off easy and there’s an extension for your tablet, which also includes a couple of fans and the bike’s display.
There’s lots of adjustment possible, including crank length, although it’s a bit fiddly to get your setup right. You can adjust the gear ratios to match your outdoor bike; the Shimano-like shifters were awkward to use, though. We found that we had to supplement the small, built-in fans to get effective cooling.
The Tacx NEO doesn’t tilt like the Wahoo Kickr Bike, but the Road Feel, Gear Feel and Descent Simulation features do add to the ride realism.
In Normal mode, the NEO Smart’s resistance changes were realistic through the testing period, but in ERG mode, the bike sometimes struggled to maintain the power required by Zwift.
The smart bike market has grown significantly in the past couple of years. We haven’t tested these indoor bikes, but here’s a range of alternative options.
The TrueBike is a neat-looking option from Dutch brand TrueKinetix.
Priced at €3,250, the company says it’s designed to offer a realistic ride feel, with an algorithm that takes into account factors including your weight.
Its flywheel-free design will provide resistance of up to 1,500 watts and simulate gradients of up to 15 per cent up or down, with 22 gears and connectivity to Zwift and other training apps.
If you’ve got deep pockets and have become accustomed to hunkering down in your bunker, there’s the SRM SmartIT.
Unlike most of its competitors, the SmartIT runs off a regular drivetrain with 11-speed shifting courtesy of Shimano 105 components. Resistance is controlled via a handlebar-mounted remote, plus it has wireless connectivity for use with third-party software. SRM says the SmartIT can simulate up to 1,400 watts.
It’s a suitably spendy option from the maker of the pros’ favoured power meter, and it’s fair to say the design doesn’t quite look as sleek as other options we’ve listed here.
It does, however, incorporate SRM’s Origin power meter, which the brand says has an accuracy of +/- 1%. That, however, does mean crank length is fixed.
The 65kg weight and stainless steel frame mean you’ll probably want a home gym to keep the SRM in – but you’ve got that already, haven’t you?
Peloton’s exercise bike is another indoor training solution, although unlike the other options featured here, this one isn’t really designed specifically with cyclists in mind. It’s more of a replacement for the spinning classes at your gym than support for structured cycling workouts.
Unlike most smart bikes, power is an estimate from an algorithm based on cadence and resistance – there’s no strain gauge built into the bike.
There is, however, a built-in screen to pipe video of live daily classes to you, as well as access to Peloton’s library of workouts. There’s also a monthly fee, though that does give you access to community features such as leaderboards, music and playlists.
Peloton is a closed system, so you won’t be able to hook it up to third-party training apps.
Unlike the spin bikes you might see in a gym, the latest generation of smart bikes are designed with dedicated cyclists in mind. You can expect accurate power measurement, a highly adjustable position and variable (and automatically controlled) resistance to give you the best indoor training experience.
Whereas an indoor exercise bike will usually have limited manual adjustability to resistance, indoor smart bikes use similar tech to smart trainers and are designed to offer a realistic, road-like feel when pedalling.
They will measure your power output and, if you want them to, automatically adjust resistance, whether that’s to match the incline of a virtual road on Zwift or so you hit the required wattage in a structured workout.
The best indoor bikes will offer lots of adjustment, too, including saddle height and fore/aft, handlebar position and even crank length, allowing you to replicate the position of your regular bike. That adjustability will also allow multiple members of the same household to use the bike.
Most smart bike brands offer workouts developed in-house, as well as Bluetooth and/or ANT+ connectivity to third-party apps such as Zwift, Wahoo SYSTM, RGT Cycling and TrainerRoad.
Training apps provide a much more engaging and immersive indoor ride experience, often with a video or virtual simulation of outdoor terrain. They’ll also let you challenge your mates, embark on a training plan or simply ride against others.
Unlike most turbo trainers or rollers, which fold down for storage, smart bikes are a permanent fixture.
What’s more, in order to handle a cyclist riding at full tilt or out of the saddle, smart bikes are usually heavy and have large bases, so they’re not something you will want to lug around. Nor will they fit in the bottom of a cupboard when not in use.
With that in mind, you’ll want to make sure you’ve got the space for a smart bike, with an electricity supply close by so it’s set up ready to ride.
Plus, all that tech is pricey – a dedicated smart indoor bike will set you back at least four figures, and a lot more for the latest crop of machinery.
The flip side, of course, is a dedicated, high-tech training tool ready for you to jump on at any point.
]]>POC has announced its latest time trial helmet, the Procen.
Taking inspiration from POC’s existing time trial helmets, the Cerebel Raceday and Tempor (which will remain in POC’s range), the Procen combines them into a more conventional form than we’re used to from the Swedish brand.
POC says its objective for the Procen was to improve the cooling characteristics of the helmet, without giving up aerodynamic performance compared to the Tempor or Cerebel Raceday.
POC says it has used the Venturi effect – the reduction in pressure that occurs when a fluid (or the airflow, in this instance) passes through a choke point – to improve the Procen’s cooling and aerodynamics.
The three large vents on the front of the helmet enable air to flow through it, over the rider’s head and out of the rear of the helmet, taking excess heat with it.
POC says the placement of these ventilation holes also serves an aerodynamic purpose.
According to the brand, these holes are “designed to drain the high-pressure zone at the front of the helmet”. This reduces the build-up of “stagnant air and additional air resistance” that riders would otherwise need to overcome.
As with the Tempor, Cerebel Raceday and recently launched Propel aero sunglasses, the POC Procen was designed using CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) modelling and analysis.
POC says it performed 3D scans of a number of athletes from its sponsored men’s and women’s WorldTour teams, EF Education-EasyPost and EF Education-Tibco-SVB.
These models were then used to optimise the Procen for a range of time trial positions.
The truncated trailing edge of the helmet is similar to that seen on the Kask Beluga.
POC says it has been shaped to reduce turbulence and enable the airflow from the outer edge of the helmet to combine cleanly with that coming from inside of it.
The Procen also uses a very subtly flared edge on the rear side edges, which POC says helps to direct airflow over the rider’s shoulders.
This shaping is much less radical than on the Tempor, though.
When asked “which helmet is fastest?”, POC said it would “depend on the rider” and their position on the bike, but that it is “extremely happy” with the aerodynamic performance of the Procen.
It also noted that getting the best out of the Tempor typically “requires a precise body position and technique”.
Indeed, when we reviewed the Tempor back in 2014, it proved extremely fast in a wind tunnel and the real world.
Our tester also found it to be very sensitive to changes in head position, however, making it tricky to recommend as an option for riders who couldn’t optimise their bike fit around the helmet, or hold a consistent head position while racing.
POC says the Procen takes knowledge gleaned from the Tempor (and Cerebel Raceday) but puts it in a package that’s better ventilated and less sensitive to changes in head position.
The final trick up the Procen’s sleeve is an adjustable, detachable visor.
POC says the Clarity lens can be positioned to sit “around 10mm” away from the helmet to prevent fogging while a rider is waiting to start their race. It can then be quickly pressed into place just before starting.
The POC Procen comes in a single, medium size (54 to 60cm), but includes different-sized pads to fine tune the fit.
It costs £350/$400/€400, and is available in ‘Hydrogen White’ or ‘Uranium Black Matt’.
POC’s signature fluorescent orange colourway is not an option at launch, however.
The helmet was given its race debut with EF Education-Tibco-SVB riders at La Vuelta Femenina on Monday, and will be available to purchase from September 2023.
]]>Raleigh has released the Modum electric bike, said to be an alternative to bulky cargo bikes, that can carry a child or dog in a seat on the rear rack.
The brand says the Modum’s foldable handlebars, 20-inch wheels and one-size-fits-all 40cm frame help it fit on public transport and into narrow spaces, such as hallways.
The Raleigh Modum costs £3,399 and is available in blue and green from June.
Despite its small size, the Modum electric cargo bike retains practicality through a sturdy and spacious rear rack, according to Raleigh.
The rack uses the same MIK mounting system as the Raleigh Motus Tour electric bike. The system enables you to click other MIK-compatible accessories on and off, from a child seat to a dog bicycle basket.
The brand says the Modum is the first Raleigh to be fitted with the Bosch BES3 Performance Line electric bike motor.
The Modum’s 500Wh battery is housed in the down tube and has a claimed range of 100 miles. This will suffice for a week of commuting or a weekend of exploring, according to Raleigh.
Raleigh says the battery will charge in five hours.
Additional commuter bike accessories include integrated front and rear lights, an alloy kickstand and SKS mudguards.
Raleigh has specced the Modum with five-speed Shimano Nexus hub gearing and Shimano MT200 disc brakes.
The Selle Royal Vivo Ergo saddle sits atop a dropper seatpost. Unlike on mountain bikes, on electric cargo bikes this feature is designed to make it easier to maintain stability when putting a foot down, for example at traffic lights.
]]>While bikes are often our pride and joy, not everyone in the family may feel the same way. When not in use, bikes make for an awkward object to store in the house, taking up space and being easy to knock over.
Some of us may be fortunate enough to have space to leave a bike or bikes on the floor – in a rack or not. But many will need to resort to clever solutions to maximise space and create a tidier option.
A garage is a luxury most cyclists can only dream of. If you are lucky enough to have one and security is a concern, check out our guide to the best bike locks.
Here are some of the best bike storage ideas for keeping your bike indoors, in a shed or outside.
There are many permanent bike storage solutions that mount to walls or ceilings, but if you’re renting this could prove problematic.
With this in mind, we’ve divided our guide into two distinct sections – permanent and non-permanent – with permanent options needing to be bolted or screwed in place.
Here, we’ve focused on functional and readily available solutions. But remember that a trip to the hardware store and a little ingenuity is always an option.
Also, for many people, the floor remains the cheapest and most suitable path. Axle and wheel racks are readily available, which will keep the bikes upright.
This is a good route if you own your home and have a solid wall or ceiling that can support weight and fixtures.
Permanent racks are generally the cheapest option and allow for a great deal of tweaking to suit your fleet of bikes. We’ve designated permanent racks simply by the orientation they hold the bike: vertical or horizontal.
Holding the bike by a single wheel, this method is best for storing bikes where width is an issue, but depth is not. It’s the most effective means of storing multiple bikes together, taking up less room than horizontal racks, and is commonly used in many bike shop workshops.
The simplest variations consist of a basic hook that threads into a masonry wall plug or screws directly into a wooden wall post or ceiling beam.
These are readily and cheaply available from hardware stores, although the bike-specific versions from the likes of Park Tool do offer greater wheel-size compatibility, including options for fat bikes and other large mountain bike rubber.
More advanced and secure options include those that bolt to the wall with multiple points of attachment and feature a built-in backing plate, such as models from Pro, Delta, Topeak and X-Tools to name a few.
Racks such as the SteadyRack hold the outside of the wheel and won’t mark the rim.
Its unique design enable you to swing the bike nearly 180 degrees to get access to others or have the bike sit closely against the wall. The downside? This rack isn’t cheap, especially if you want more than one.
If vertical storage is best for when width is an issue, horizontal storage is ideal for when depth of space is the concern.
Generally holding the bike underneath the top tube, this method requires more horizontal wall space.
Basic options include foldable hangers that bolt to the wall, with more expensive options taking the design concept further and creating something that is visually appealing.
Brands such as Feedback Sports offer models with adjustable hooks to fit a variety of frame shapes, while other brands offer racks that double as shelves.
For those with plenty of ceiling or wall space out of easy reach, there’s the hoist system.
They’re commonly found in hardware stores to be used for items such as ladders and kayaks, but also work well with a bicycle.
Generally, they are best for people who see cycling as an occasional pastime, rather than a lifestyle; it’s not the quickest system to use and installation is more involved than mounting a fixed hook or bracket.
Something like the Stashed SpaceRail allows you to hang multiple bikes from your ceiling, with a modular design that allows you to add more bikes to the set-up in the future.
The hooks allow the bikes to be spun around meaning you can alternate their direction to store them closer together.
Perhaps you’re renting or just not keen on drilling into things. If so, these non-permanent rack solutions are for you.
The most common type of non-permanent off-the-floor rack is the pole type that clamps between floor and ceiling.
Most common examples are the Feedback Sports Velo Column and Topeak’s Dual-Touch. The Velo Column is a little more stylish, but the Topeak offers a firmer hold against the ceiling.
These use either a spring or hinge to lock in place, but can easily be removed if needed. Generally, these racks will hold two bikes, with the option to hold a further two with aftermarket kits.
Wall-leaning solutions are less common, with racks from Delta Cycle being a rare example of bike storage that simply props against a vertical surface.
They look nice and are beyond simple to install, but aren’t suitable for use on slippery floors.
Brands such as Thule, Feedback Sports and Topeak offer free-standing bike storage, also known as ‘bike trees’. These simply use a weighted or tripod base to offer a pole to hang bikes from.
While not as clean-looking as a ceiling-to-floor rack, they may be a better option for people whose homes don’t have a solid ceiling or those who need a solution that can be moved at a moment’s notice.
Gear Up’s Off the Door rack is just like a permanent vertical hook, but simply slips over the top of a door and uses the bike’s weight to hold it in place.
Opening the door could be an issue in some locations, though.
If you have a suitably large garden or secure outside space, you can also consider a dedicated bike shed/box. These are usually smaller and harder to break into than a regular shed.
The Asgard Gladiator metal bike shed is an excellent example.
If you already have a shed, be sure to check out our article on how to improve your shed security to deter thieves.
It’s a (very) good idea to consider insuring your bike if you’re going to be storing it inside, outside or away from home.
This is another factor that may affect your storage decision. Depending on where you plan to keep your bike, you may need to consider a lockable rack solution.
Some of the rack types mentioned above, especially the permanent versions, often offer slots for a cable or D-lock. Most of the non-permanent racks will be difficult to secure.
]]>